In 2013 are you using a tech computer (as a computer) or BT for your tech diving?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Nasser

ScubaBoard Supporter
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
544
Reaction score
239
Location
Jordan, Red Sea
We are now in 2013 and with the technical advances being made over the last few years in technical computers, I'm wondering who here prefers to use dive tables (or generate their own tables with deco software) and use a bottom-timer/depth gauge ? And who prefers to use a tech computer - as a computer (not in Gauge mode) ?

cheers,
nasser
 
Both. I always use computer, BT and "cut" tables matching computer algorithm. Nothing less will do!
 
3 Computers here. Vision, Petrel and DX.

Only thing I need is an underwater EMP to go off. :D

But this is for a CCR, for OC Deco diving, I use the Petrel and a slate.
 
Dive is planned with tables and executed as much as possible according to the plan. Computer is running VPM as an "oh, *&#^" backup.
 
Computer. back-up is planned on gases available and known consumption. If computer goes phut then just use the planned gas at the intended stops.
 
BT only, tables cut with vplanner


...I also carry a backup BT on my buddy's wrist :)
 
Last edited:
2 Scubapro Galileo Sol's plus a Scubapro Meridian. All used in computer mode.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom