OP
I guess if your directly below the hole, and make an ascent it would be considered a recreational dive.
T
T
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
DIR Tec Diver once bubbled...
I live in Helsinki Finland, and I am ice diving every week here, and not only am I an Ice Diving Instructor, I am a tec diver and instructor as well, so I feel confident that I know what I am talking about here.
I have seen all types of people with their own way of doing things, and I have seen most of those fail. If you go into an overhead environment (cave, ice, wreck) and you do not have reduntant configurations then you are an accident waiting to happen. This environment in itself is a technical type of diving, but of course it can be for recreational purposes. If you don't at least carry a pony bottle then you are not brave, you are an idiot. The ideal configuration is a set of doubles and twin regulators set up on an isolator manifold.
DIR Tec Diver once bubbled...
I could never forgive myself if something happened to a fellow diver and I could have prevented it by ensuring they had some sort of bailout system.
DIR Tec Diver once bubbled...
I reccomend that someone have some sort of redundant air supply such as a pony bottle.
My question then is do you prohibit students to take part in your ICE DIVING program if they don't have a pony. This is because you only reccomend having a redundant air supply.
Now I am also a TEC diver and if I have been taught that my buddy is my redundant brain, it only makes sense that they would be my redundant air supply. Yaa think.
T