Over thinking or monetization? Sometimes it's difficult to distinguish between the two nowadays.
Name one company in this world who look at a market and see a need for a product and thinks, "we shouldn't do it because we might profit from it and people will get upset at us".
Just one.
I don't think that the commercialization of training necessarily affects people adversely. Dry suit training is a good example. When I got my first drysuit there wasn't a specialty for it, and you read above the quality of the training I got. I also paid nothing for it.
These days students pay for a drysuit course or it gets thrown in to sweeten the pot if they buy a drysuit. The training is professionalized, the students, who create the root source of demand, are able to buy a product that they obviously wanted (or it wouldn't exist!) and both PADI and the instructor get something out of it too.
That's free market economics working exactly the way it should.
This whole "PADI is evil because they make a profit on training" line of thinking is completely foreign to me. They saw a niche and created a product, people want the product and buy it, they profit from that.... how amazingly sinister.....
People who really feel like there is something wrong with that should take a good look around themselves and look at all the products they chose to buy because they wanted it. PADI isn't forcing anyone to take a drysuit specialty. People choose to buy it because it's a product that they feel will benefit them in some way. There are still places for the hard-core anti-capitalists on this planet where there is a command economy and the government tells you when and how much of a product you are required/allowed to buy, but most of those places are not places you would want to live.
Frankly, I don't see PADI as being a greedy company at all. Yes, some of their decisions are crafted to grow a market bigger (what company doesn't do that?) but on the whole I think divers benefit enormously from the availability of professional training..... (and now one or two people are going to get set off by that and post something like "PADI is everything but professional, blah-blah-blah-hate-hate-hate..." but we've heard it all before. Meanwhile millions of divers have been trained and are enjoying this sport immensely every day.
Just something to think about.
R..
---------- Post added November 14th, 2013 at 03:45 PM ----------
You know what is so hard for me to understand, is the reluctance of so many here on SB to SEE the relevance of Drag and efficient propulsion to achieving either better adventures or more safety.
Actually, Dan, what I saw in your posts was *your* reluctance to understand that the *team* has to adjust to accommodate the gear choices of all of its members. You're calling it a "safety" issue, but what I'm hearing you say is that you hate it when your buddies can't keep up to you when you're swimming around a mile a minute.
Do gear choices create limitations? Yes, of course they do. Drag is real, it's a limitation and the speed at which you can swim should be considered in the planning of a dive.
Can you, and *should* you accommodate for the limitations of gear choices in your planning and your team protocols? Most people would find the answer obvious. In your case it seems to make you think that everyone who can't swim around at your top speed is somehow being unsafe. Personally I find that weird, but having known you and having listened to your favorite "soap box" arguments for 12-odd years, it makes me pity you a little but it doesn't surprise me anymore.
R..