For clarity, i don't have any dog in this fight so to speak. If you want to buy and use an Air2, go right ahead, frankly, if you want to do all your diving on the end of $5 worth of plastic garden hose, or only dive on $10k worth of titanium arctic ice diving rated regsets, go ahead too, it's your choice, no one is forcing you to do anything!
However, the point i was making is that an Air2 is primarily a "backup" regulator, you turn to it when things have gone wrong with your primary, (or your buddies using your primary etc) And at this point, there is (in my humble opinion) a significant difference when it comes to cold water performance, namely the resistance to freeflow as a result of freezing due to adiabatic airstream cooling under load. And although that freezing is typically more a direct function of the water content of your breathing gas, it is also driven by the regulators ability to source heat from the surrounding water, ie it's effective thermal impedance to that water.
I dive in the UK, fairly regularly at 10degC or below, and most of the gear UK divers use is of a known cold water performance, both through design, but just as importantly through a lot of actual, in-water use in a huge variety of situations, both normal and emergency ones. ie not just "theoretical" cold water performance but also "real world proven" cold water performance.
And that last point, is what i'm going to respectfully suggest is probably missing for the Air2. For all i know it might have brilliant cold water performance, heck it might make my Apeks MTX-R set look like a Home Depot sink "U-bend" for all i know, but i'm not sure there is enough rear world, in-cold-water evidence to support that suggestion, hence on my boats, when i look around i see all the other divers with Apeks regs and no-one has an AIR2.
And that really was the point of my first, er, point! There is a difference between diving "with" and diving "using" an Air2 in cold water,e specially if you want to include potential scenario's like airsharing, fighting currents, or high water content air fills into the equation
Does that make an AIR2 a bad thing, no of course not, but it could make it less appropriate under the specific circumstances we are talkign about here. And again, at the risk of repeating myself, its up to every individual to make there own call on this, i can't tell you what to do!
Regarding my 0-24 dives, i have this set simply because i have less than 25 dives since restarting diving. I originally was taught to dive at university i the early 1990's, when things were a bit difference to the tech and gear we take for granted now. I did a fair bit of diving, all in typical Uk conditions, cold, poor viz, heay currents etc, i'd have to go find my old paper log books to see how many dives i did back then, i'd guess at around 400 to 500 ish over probably 8 years.
In 2000 i moved away from the sea, to live in the place in the UK that is geopraphically about as far as it's possible to be from the sea, and my job (in motorsport (Formula 1, WRC, LeMans etc) and ultra high performance road car development) mean't i had no dives for the last 20 odd years. Then last year, i decided to take up diving again, and decided it was worth recertifiying due to the long dry gap and significant changes in diving tech, methods and approaches that have developed over that time. Then Covid hit, and my plan to rack up a fair few dives both in the UK and abroad during 2020 got necessarily paused. Hence i now sit at 22 dives since recertification, hence the number in my profile.