Exactly. Increased mechanical complexity in a system is seldom a move in the right direction. This is especially the case when the increased complexity adds an item that can fail and cause issues on any of you dives when it will only prove useful in the event of a very rare or unlikely event. The cost benefit analysis just does not support that approach.
I had a team mate who had a slight freeflow in a tight, silty tunnel. The viz was just good enough to see the team mate take out the reg, and as they did so I was thinking "don't bang on the reg to fix it!" when they banged on the reg to fix it and got a full on freeflow that then required a valve shutdown and blew the rest of the viz.
As an aside, and related to the "don't add uneccesary complexity on a dive" argument, I am glad the team mate did not try to remove the face plate to fix the reg under water. It probably would have worked, but it was totally not required given that we were exiting and given that we had used proper gas management. There was more than enough gas in the remaining tank to exit the cave safely, so there was zero need to try to "fix" the reg, especially in less than optimal conditions.
In that regard, I just don't see the need for removing a face plate under water. Having a failure on entry should result in the team turning the dive, and assuming you are no where near the turn pressure, you will still be fat on gas in either a BM or SM configuration, so there is again no need.
If the failure occurs at max penetration and you were unwise enough to dive to thirds, you might be potentially short of gas and be tempted to try it, but doing so will burn time and gas you no longer have, and you are delaying your teamate(s) as well. By imposing the delay on the tema while you atemptto fix your reg, you are in effect burning their reserve gas as well. In that case, it makes more sense in the big picture to just start the exit and share gas if needed in bigger portions of the cave where it won't materially delay the exit. If there are no bigger portions of the cave, or if you were choosing to dive solo, then you should have been more conservative in the gas planning in the first place.
And to review a previous post, if the reg failed open, you still have the feathering option and stand to lose that option to access gas if your "fix" is not successful.
Conseuqently, when you look at all of the options, pros, cons and consequences, there is seldom if ever any need to remove the face plate unless you are nearing the end of a list emergency options. At thr risk of getitng flamed, I'll suggest those who have done it were perhaps too quick to jump on that particular option, may not have considered the big picture and may have made a better descision by staying with the planning and emergency optiosn they were trained to use.
Finally, prevention makes a lot more sense. Putting the second stages in a nylon stocking will keep any particles large enough to cause problems out of them, and will still let you breathe off them with no delay if needed. Given that the suggestion came from a diver who has been sidemounting for 35 years in tighter and nastier stuff that I have yet done, I give his advice a lot of weight.