I am hard headed for sure. During the heyday of the G250 series I was still chugging on an old USD Royal Aqua Master or an antique USD Mistral and eschewing plastic fantastics for my fleet of USD/AL 1085s. During my earlier times I worked at a Scubapro store but it was pre G250 and I never cared for the 109 due to it's tiny exhaust valve compared to the 1085. It was Robert Couvillon that finally brought me into the light and the goodness of the G250
. Better late than never I guess. I still do not care for the 109, but now, the 156 CE big valve, uh, yes, nice
.
A 1085 with a roller lever, adjustable orifice, diver adjustable spring tension, composite cover on the brass (okay dreaming, make it titanium) body, I would drop the G250 like a hot potato. There is this, close:
The plastic and metal SuperFlow® second stage SCUBA regulators are high performance, non-balanced, venturi assisted, fully adjustable regulators. They are based on the original SuperFlow® SuperLite® 17 Helmet and BandMask® SuperFlow® regulators.
www.kirbymorgan.com
Halcyon could have said there is nothing wrong with the regulator, that it is the user, or they could have fixed the issue, assuming there is one, but in this case silence is not golden. The Halcyon being a G250 which itself dates back to 1980 is not exactly a new and unproven design. It is perplexing.
Edit to add, I am not dismissing the OP or anyone else who says they have repeated problems as described throughout this thread. And to further add, the 1085 comes up because it and similar non-balanced regulators like some of the Mares line are known to have a very smooth and progressive Venturi and I do agree to some extent that the G250 and it's ilk sometimes may feel like they are shifting gears as the Venturi kicks in and sucks the diaphragm down.