Yeah I'm serious. Stuart has been on this site for 4-5 years, there are countless GUE class reports and discussion from GUE divers. We had this wonderfully detailed and informative class report and his question is "Will the instructor withhold a card from a passing student if the student doesn't drink all the kool-aid after class?"
Lorenzoid is doing a great job answering the questions so I'm not going to address it further, but Stuart should know better from his diving experience and his time on this site. He implied malevolent intent to innocuous questions that were asked before and after class and meant to provide feedback and generate discussion.
You are reading way too much into my question. Sensitive much? Did I strike a chord?
There is no "malevolent intent" in wanting to know whether a Tech Pass only requires the watermanship and passing the written test, or if it also requires heartfelt endorsement of ALL the rules/policies/whatever you want to call them. Personally, I would expect any tech or intro to tech type of course to include SOME kind of evaluation of the student's mindset. I would expect someone to not pass if the instructor found them to have the in-water skills and the book knowledge, yet demonstrate totally inadequate judgment. I was left to wonder, based on this report, whether that "inadequate judgment" assessment might be applied to someone who gets to the end of Fundies and still thinks solo diving is fine or diving on air to 130 feet is fine.
What you and
@Lorenzoid seem to be asserting is that there is no assessment of judgment that would influence whether you pass or fail Fundies? Or, at least, that that assessment is over and done with and the questions at the end do not have any influence on that.
I have read many Fundies reports. I don't recall seeing others that mentioned this set of questions at the end of the course and before getting their results. Thus, me asking the question now and not after reading any of the previous Fundies reports.
You DO get how asking these questions before telling the student their results could give the APPEARANCE that their answers might influence the result they are given, don't you?
If Mer wanted to avoid even that appearance, she might consider asking the student to write down their answers and hold them, then give the student their results, and THEN review the student's written answers. But, that is neither here nor there.