trigfunctions
Contributor
All of the arguments about Greenpeace are irrelevant to the issue of whether or not the 700 lbs of PCBs that the Navy acknowledges were left on the ship pose a concern to health and the environment. As Dr. Bill said, sometimes the facts are the facts, regardless of the messenger.
The Navy says it did a risk analysis and doesn't consider the PCBs to be a threat. As an environmental engineer who is routinely involved in pollution investigations and risk assessments, I'm skeptical. However, I know people who work in the environmental sections of the DoD and I believe they can do good work. Personally, though, I would rather spend the extra $$$ and have the PCBs removed instead of turning the Gulf into a testing lab for the risk analysis theories.
The Navy says it did a risk analysis and doesn't consider the PCBs to be a threat. As an environmental engineer who is routinely involved in pollution investigations and risk assessments, I'm skeptical. However, I know people who work in the environmental sections of the DoD and I believe they can do good work. Personally, though, I would rather spend the extra $$$ and have the PCBs removed instead of turning the Gulf into a testing lab for the risk analysis theories.