JonG1
Contributor
Just wondering would you have a link for this?
Regards
Cathal
I think it was Doolette tbh published in in depth I'll see if I can link it, but might already be in boulder John's post above
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Just wondering would you have a link for this?
Regards
Cathal
Yes, it was Doolette, not Pollock. But Pollock is in the same ballpark as Mitchell and Doolette. Here is a quote from a presentation he made that I included in my article:I think it was Doolette tbh published in in depth I'll see if I can link it, but might already be in boulder John's post above
50/75. I would go a bit higher even (60), but even getting buddies use 50 has been a long long term project. There is some serious inertia at 20 (GUE) and 30 (Shearwater default)
Hahaha!! I think I resemble that remark!! 50/80 now. I could do 60.
It's been a bit of a process from the 20/95 days.
Thanks for that link, an interesting article from a very well qualified diver in this area!!
And generally, your GF99 will decline about 2% per min at 10 feet, so I read your comment as saying you actually surface at something like 74-79 with those GFs.50/80 or 50/85, depending on the duration of deco. Shorter deco, I'll surface when I hit a lower surfacing gradient factor (i.e. if my computer says 2 minutes of total deco for a dive at Ginnie, I'll stick around for 5).