These last few posts have been reassuring. Because while I don't have a fraction of the experience
@kensuf has, the comment below seems slightly backwards. After noting that with short deco he'll pad an extra few minutes (prompting my estimate of what his actual surfacing GF99 might be), he then noted that with long deco obligations, he'll stick right with the plan:
If I have a 3 hour deco obligation, such as my last dive at the nest 2 weeks ago, I'll be happy to surface with a GF of 85.
Now I understand a reluctance to spend any more time than you have to in deco, especially on a long dive. But I don't understand why GFLo 80 with three minutes of padding (e.g, surfacing GF of 74) is desirable for short deco, but on a long dive (with even more filling of slow tissues that are not as resistant to kissing the M-factor as fast tissues might be), one not only doesn't pad, but chooses a higher GF as well?
I'm not picking on you,
@kensuf . I just don't understand the logic, beyond "I feel fine". If 85 is your comfort zone, then so be it. But if something is making you wait to 74 on an easy dive, then why is 85 okay when your loading is greater? I understand a reluctance to add 30 min of deco to get to 74, but then why bother with it on a short dive?
If there's some doubt prompting you to add 3 min when it's easy, it seems like normalization of deviance to skip it when the price is higher, e.g., 30 cu ft more oxygen. Help me understand how you chose this.
And you're not alone:
@rjack321 does the same thing, I think:
Up to a point I just use 5min increments rounding up: 5,10,15, 20 After about 18-20 I tend to follow the plan more than just hang around until the deco is blown off and a bit.
I don't get it.