scubasean:
...What I didn't see was addressing the combo of having no air in the b/c and having no reg in your mouth at the same time....Do you do this combo? If so, why do you consider this safer than having your reg in your mouth?
That is mainly what confuses me...It is the combo, not one or the other in isolation.
Ok, the combination of Regulator in or out of the mouth with no air in the BC is the question.
I really dont see it as a combination. The decision to use a snorkel or have the regulator in your mouth is IMHO independent of the the decision to have air in or not in the BC question. Regulator in or out of the mouth does not affect my decision to have no air in my BC for a beach entry. Either way I would still do a beach entry with no air in the BC for the reasons already discussed.
I have done my entries both ways, with a snorkel and no air in the BC (only during the 3R class) and with a regulator in my mouth and no air in the BC (my normal).
Remember we are talking strictly beach entry here so the water is not higher than shoulder level. Therefore the lack of buoyancy is really not an issue. If you dive under a wave or get hit, after it passes, you just stand up and breathe. If you have moved into deeper water while under the wave (you are now past the surf zone), just inflate the BC with the power inflator. Please note rock entries are different. Once I am in water where I can no longer touch the bottom I am out of the surf zone and I inflate my BC, lie back and put on my fins quickly and paddle further out (in case that rouge wave is planning on making an appearance). If I am not past the surf zone and I can no longer touch the bottom during the lull between waves, then I am heading back to shore and not diving anyway.
scubacalifornia:
I can understand not wanting the added buoyancy of a filled BC when trying to go down/under a wave. But I'm not clear on the detriment of having a regulator in your mouth, except that it could be yanked out if one gets tumbled....
Here is the theory behind the recommendation by some of not entering with a regulator in your mouth. They argue that if you have a regulator in your mouth and get hit by a wave and tumbled, your first response will be to take a nice, big breath. Now we need to look at the dynamics of the situation for a moment. You take a breath while under the wave. Odds are you will do so just about the time the peak of the wave passes over you. So lets say your depth gauge reads 8 feet as the wave passes over. The 1st stage will deliver air at the appropriate pressure for 8 feet. Now the wave passes and you are suddenly in 3 feet of water. You have just (without moving) gone up 5 feet, with the corresponding change in pressure and could potentially suffer a lung expansion injury or embolism.
That is the theory behind it. The 3Rs (rocks, rips and reefs) teaches to go in with a snorkel. That is probably good advice.
Personally I say, And what good is a snorkel going to do me under water?
While I hear their argument and agree it has merit, I personally enter the water with the regulator in my mouth, and mask on (contact lenses so I dont want water splashed in the eyes) and breathing around the regulator. My plan if I get hit by a wave or dive under a wave, is to simply clamp my lips around the regulator and blow (remember I want to go down not up so I want to empty my lungs). If I do take a breath, I will try to keep it a very small sip and never close my airway. Remember we are not talking (I hope) minutes here, just the few seconds I need for the wave to pass over and for me to stand up again. If we are talking minutes, then I am pinned to the bottom or being tumbled by a very large wave and I should not have been (and probably wont be) in the water in the first place. But stuff does happen and we all have seen the rouge wave come in to the beach. So if I take a small breath at only 25% or less of the lung capacity my lungs should be able to handle the expansion of the air when the depth rapidly changes by 4 to 6 feet. Given my max depth was under 15 feet (5 feet of standing water with a 10 foot wave passing over which would be the rouge wave previously discussed) or ½ ATA increase. So with the expansion of the air in my lungs, I would still only have 75% of lung capacity. Naturally, I cant really estimate my own lung capacity and accurately regulate how much percentage wise I inhale in this situation so there is a risk. But I believe I can keep it well below what the air will expand and I dont close my airway.
DISCLAIMER: Not a Dive Instructor, Physicist, Doctor or other qualified expert on the subject. In fact if you ask my wife I know nothing about anything. Please note the qualified experts recommend no regulator in the mouth when entering the water from a beach. The above is just my opinion and does not constitute advice. Every diver is responsible for their own dive decisions and I am just spouting off about what I do, which may not be the best solution.