How is it that those brands that believe in the right to repair aren’t flogged with never ending law suits?
Because they are a tiny drop in the ocean with very little sample space to make any conclusions.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
How is it that those brands that believe in the right to repair aren’t flogged with never ending law suits?
They are big enough that if lawsuits for DIY were a thing, they would be put out of business by it.Because they are a tiny drop in the ocean with very little sample space to make any conclusions.
But they are niche enough that (I would bet) far more of their regs are bought by highly motivated divers who are inclined to learn how to service the regs (or know enough that they will leave reg servicing to the pros) than by Joe Shmo Diver (to borrow from Stuart's characterization).They are big enough that if lawsuits for DIY were a thing, they would be put out of business by it.
They are big enough that if lawsuits for DIY were a thing, they would be put out of business by it.
I am not sure if you own Atomic Ti reg currently. If you have them, and if you go measure the weight, you will find weight saving is minimal. First stage brass vs Ti different is about 6oz. 2nd stage different is about 1oz. Total saving on a set of reg, 1st+2x 2nd, 8oz. Nothing against Ti, I have some, just cannot use weight saving to justify the cost. LOL.Choosing the TFX would be primarily on the basis of having a very lightweight, corrosion-proof(-ish?) reg set that breathes REALLY well for packing to take on those Caribbean type trips. Other use (like teaching OW) would just be because that's what I have.
Well, yes, but he talked about having a service manual and kits in the box. Thus, any schmoe that buys one would have the manual and parts. I don't think the reason to not do THAT is strictly protectionism. It's to keep people who buy a reg from Leisure Pro from working on their stuff and killing themselves.
So you’re saying that the RTR (right to repair) companies are too small to be sued, but somebody like Scubapro is big enough to make it worth the cost and effort to sue them?Because they are a tiny drop in the ocean with very little sample space to make any conclusions.
I have been out of the US shell. I grew up in Africa. Worldwide, the US is the most litigious country. If someone was going to sue because of botched DIY, it would be there. For a company like Deep6, it would only take one successful lawsuit to put them out of business. Given that they make DIY easy, you would think they would be hit by one of these suits if it was a thing. Internationally, particularly in the EU, the right to repair is more of a thing. This is why may US DIYers get their parts from the EU and other foreign suppliers. I have gotten SP OEM service kits from ScubaGaskets in the EU, but can't from any US supplier.Worldwide??? You have to get out of your shell inside the barbed wire in the US my friend
It may be that RTR dive gear companies have so far sold regs mostly to fairly knowledgeable divers through mostly word-of-mouth advertising, and the number of regs sold may have been a tiny fraction of all regs sold, even just in the US. Of that relatively small number of regs sold to relatively knowledgeable divers, how many have failed during a dive and injured the diver, and of those, how many had been serviced by the user? Maybe none. So it may not be surprising that an RTR dive gear company has not been sued on that basis.So you’re saying that the RTR (right to repair) companies are too small to be sued, but somebody like Scubapro is big enough to make it worth the cost and effort to sue them?
Well, if my supply lines ever dry up for my fairly large fleet of Scubapro regs then maybe a company like Deep 6, Hog, or better yet DGX with their Xtra balanced piston reg might be on the horizon. Maybe smaller is better, they can fly under the radar.It may be that RTR dive gear companies have so far sold regs mostly to fairly knowledgeable divers through mostly word-of-mouth advertising, and the number of regs sold may have been a tiny fraction of all regs sold, even just in the US. Of that relatively small number of regs sold to relatively knowledgeable divers, how many have failed during a dive and injured the diver, and of those, how many had been serviced by the user? Maybe none. So it may not be surprising that an RTR dive gear company has not been sued on that basis.