DiverAmy
Prism2 CCR Diver
From a practical standpoint, this is not an unreasonable lawsuit.
Even if Rob is mostly responsible for his own death, he is arguably not completely responsible, based on the very limited descriptions of what occurred both here on SB and around the internet. Without having accurate detail, here's just a few "off the top of my head" questions.
Did his (former) instructor have an enhanced duty to him, more than a dive buddy or dive master? Did the boat crew have an enhanced duty to keep an eye on him, being his buddy was clearly not well, and presumably knowing that he decided to do three tech dives in one day? Was his very recent instruction clear about the dangers of his decisions? I'm not looking for answers to these. They are hypothetical questions to think about.
Additionally, Rob's life, in terms of of damages is VERY valuable. The way our system works is that a young, educated, employed, white male is the most valuable life in terms of tort law. A super rich, young, white male even more. While it's fun to vilify lawyers, this law suit doesn't seem out of bounds to me. Even if Rob was 90% at fault, the other 10% might be valuable. Sometimes a big consideration for a family (I don't know the particulars here, and am not interested) is the loss of a MAJOR breadwinner. Family might have been counting on his income to live.
Even if Rob is mostly responsible for his own death, he is arguably not completely responsible, based on the very limited descriptions of what occurred both here on SB and around the internet. Without having accurate detail, here's just a few "off the top of my head" questions.
Did his (former) instructor have an enhanced duty to him, more than a dive buddy or dive master? Did the boat crew have an enhanced duty to keep an eye on him, being his buddy was clearly not well, and presumably knowing that he decided to do three tech dives in one day? Was his very recent instruction clear about the dangers of his decisions? I'm not looking for answers to these. They are hypothetical questions to think about.
Additionally, Rob's life, in terms of of damages is VERY valuable. The way our system works is that a young, educated, employed, white male is the most valuable life in terms of tort law. A super rich, young, white male even more. While it's fun to vilify lawyers, this law suit doesn't seem out of bounds to me. Even if Rob was 90% at fault, the other 10% might be valuable. Sometimes a big consideration for a family (I don't know the particulars here, and am not interested) is the loss of a MAJOR breadwinner. Family might have been counting on his income to live.