You're not waving "I am OK" if you are panting like a dog from hypercapnia, from what I heard others report.
This being said, I would not trust the rMS with my life, from my personal experience with its potential unreliability (cold water, shallower, shorter dives).
But at 2 hr (tops?) per dive during the first 2 dives, in warmish water, unless they had to raise the wreck to free the anchor, I would venture to say that they had plenty of autonomy with proper scrubbers.
Now, there is no way to know whether that was the case, since the rMS reading are not recorded (just a brief cryptic and mostly useless summary post dive, in the best cases).
A simple multideco calculation, 10/50 diluent, using my 30/80 GF settings gives this for 2 dives with 30 min bottom time (22 min at depth) separated by a 3hr SI:
dive 1: RT = 117 min
dive 2: RT = 128 min (CNS toxicity alert)
After 1 hr of trying to get the anchor off the wreck, they go down for a 15 min BT (7 min at depth)
dive 3: RT = 38 min (CNS toxicity alert)
That's not 5 hrs on the scrubber, which is within specs (
here). I would not consider hypercapnia of BOTH divers too plausible.
With a 1 l/min O2 metabolism (high), they would have used up very little of their 400 l of O2 at the bottom (assuming a full tank at the beginning), but 230 ft is 8 ata, so just filling the counter lungs (
4.5 l non CE for the micro) would be at least 36 l right there. 117+128+38+3x36 = 353 l...
Now, without the computer readings, this is all pure speculative scenario.