If you think that's bad, wait until you have a burst disk go on a trimix fill on the way to your $1500 charter.That's scary. That's a bad day.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If you think that's bad, wait until you have a burst disk go on a trimix fill on the way to your $1500 charter.That's scary. That's a bad day.
I have and bought so many used tanks and never had a failed hydro or even a need for tumble...
For a hydro failure of HP steel is it just wear and tear or abuse from overfill?
For exemption tanks yeah, there are more failed for not prestretching them than any other explanation. Although some do occasionally fail even when properly tested.It's more likely an inappropriate test where they failed to prestretch the tank. I will only take my tanks to a hydro facility that speicalizes in dive cylinders. The fire extinguisher places in florida have failed alot of good tanks becaue they don't keep up with the tech bulletins.
Not sure what the OP is paying, but my local tester (who does most shops' hydros on contract but also does retail) charges over $30 retail nowadays. That's without a scuba vip, o2 cleaning, valve cleaning, o-ring, fill, etc. They are in Seattle, not the cheapest property to own or staff to pay. But really makes me wonder about the $8 hydros people boast about getting.
I'm happy to pay, they have failed 2 of my (I have 40+ tanks so this is well over 200+ hydros) in almost 20 years of diving here and I was grateful they pulled them from service.
per the op - The initial push was just for 30 seconds... Which is not the round-out procedure, then did the single test. Not proper...
To those that wanted to know about the plus rating, the tanks did not get the + rating.
Mine are;
REE - 62 / EE - 57
REE - 62 / EE - 56.9
In a perfect world, can you run me through what you think a test should look like?
You should be able to bring the tanks and the report back and ask them to stamp the plus rating. If they say no, then you know that this shop is one to avoid in the future, and unfortunately, in my mind it would cast doubt on their failure of your other tank. But start with a friendly call and ask for the plus, you have the proof that they passed. Maybe they charge a little extra for that, which is dumb because literally the only additional work is to stamp the plus, but they are in it to make money so you just play along.
You wouldn't believe how many hydro shops I had to call in San Antonio and Austin just to find one that would give my tanks a plus rating. One of the really bad ones even stamped the words "no plus" on the tank because they thought the tanks were too old to be safely filled to 10% over. You can't make this stuff up, nobody would believe it.
In your case, though, right there on the form is a spot for the plus rating, so that shop should be able to give it to you without any absurd excuses.
If I sound a little jaded, it's because I've had bad experiences with hydro shops; that's one of the things that eventually made me sell all my tanks except for a pair of AL80s. At least they know about those....sort of. The last place I brought them to insisted that all AL scuba tanks are required to have a VE test at every hydro (that's false) and they charged $7 for that test. So I paid an extra $14 to play along, hardly a financial disaster, just an annoyance.
refer to the specifically detailed "round-out procedure" issued by Faber, and follow it "letter of the law" (no, it is not a law, but I mean strict adherence)... I don't have it handy or access to it, but the "minimum 30 seconds or until reading stabilizes" is what I constantly refer to....