bradlw
Contributor
Maybe the newer analyzers are more standardized and things are better...but back when I was actively diving I was always 'troubled' by the lack of standardization and consistency in the analyzers and testing methods. I realized that mostly though that was just caught up in the analysis paralysis of my 'engineering' brain. For this reason I would love to have my own analyzer...at least in theory....but I never did.
When I went through my technical diving and blending training I was taught to be very methodical about the way the analyzer is used. My instructor's analyzer was calibrated based on 1atm, static flow rate.... and if you cracked the valve open and let the gas flow across the sensor at higher velocity it would read higher because of the increased partial pressure. Some shops tried to hit a certainly standard flow rate with their analyzers usually with no great way to measure that rate.... Not many shops I ran across had analyzers set up to actually measure 1atm static flow....and rarely would I be familiar with the particular specs and operation of their particular brand/model of analyzer so I'd juts have to take them at their word.....
When I went through my technical diving and blending training I was taught to be very methodical about the way the analyzer is used. My instructor's analyzer was calibrated based on 1atm, static flow rate.... and if you cracked the valve open and let the gas flow across the sensor at higher velocity it would read higher because of the increased partial pressure. Some shops tried to hit a certainly standard flow rate with their analyzers usually with no great way to measure that rate.... Not many shops I ran across had analyzers set up to actually measure 1atm static flow....and rarely would I be familiar with the particular specs and operation of their particular brand/model of analyzer so I'd juts have to take them at their word.....