Not the money you are paying to the LDS for service. Nor is it about the liability issues that should be attached to a shop selling you parts.
It's about keeping the money out of the pockets of the "starving" trial lawyer who wants to line HIS pockets with the money he can extort from the LDS and manufacturers.
The problem isn't the dive shop or the manufacturers. The problem is folks who can lay a $10,000 to 100,000 "fine" of defense lawer fees on a company with NO responsibility if they loose or the case is baseless. If the US adopts a "looser pays" where the plaintiff (or the plantiffs lawyer if the case was taken on a contingency fee basis) is on the hook for minimum pre-defined defense lawer hourly costs if the trial court or jury finds the plaintiff's case without merit.
A simple solution would be to prohibit lawyers from ever again practicing law, or an any way recieving money directly or indirectly from a person or corporation that practices law, if they EVER served in a positon the writes laws or regulations having the force of law. Simple conflict of interest rules apply to everyone else, perhaps they should be applied to lawyers as well. If they want to write the rules for the game, they shouldn't play in the game any more.
Then specifically define what the manufacturer's liability is. This should be for a design _known_ to be defective at the time of the part's production, or the sale of a defective part. Customer stupidity and inattention to details is _not_ the responsibility of manufacturer/sales outlet.
The problem, and the potential solution, resides between Maryland and Virginia. Your Congresscritter should know you by your fist name until the issue is resolved, or he's unemployed.
FT