I'm sure you could find similar warnings in British Admiralty...
You mean the same British Admiralty that issued rations of grog to the sailors up in the yardarms, lol? Like 4 pints a day?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I'm sure you could find similar warnings in British Admiralty...
Didn't really need any historic examples to instill that, it just seemed like common sense.
It is just common sense. You don't want to be doing something like diving while your ability is impaired, just as you don't want to be driving under those conditions.
Interesting thread. And maybe even more interesting due to comparisions to driving (and changed attitudes over the years).No one is saying it is a good idea. What was asked was historic data.
Much like drunk driving isn't tolerated today, not that long ago it was treated much like a speeding ticket.
If you are under 40 years old you probably don't understand. Or a millennial who chooses what history to believe and what to ignore because they don't like it.
It was taboo 33 years ago when I certified, but post-dive drinking was required. (In fact, at least locally the "snorkel test," involving beer and a snorkel, is still the informal "final exam" for newly certified divemasters....)
Is back in the day measured in Weeks? Months? Years?.