gangrel441
Contributor
PRL:I wasn't trying to nitpick (sorry if it seemed that way) just wanted to point out to an SB user claiming that 30 seconds was to long to surface from over 70 ft, that he misunderstood the sentance.
True, but if there is anything here to criticize (and I most certainly am not), it is that a 30 second (or less) ascent from 70 ft increased the risk that there would be two victims rather than one. To say that the ascent should have been done in 10 seconds because it has been done safely before is ludicrous.
PRL:I agree 100%, just got a little steamed when I saw someone critsizing a SUCCESFUL rescue.
This was precisely the reason for my earlier post. Talk of professional rescuers rocketing a victim to the surface so fast that their "fins cleared the water", whether exaggerated or ripped from the headlines, should be left in the "folks, do not try this at home" catagory. As a rescuer with a support crew on the boat, would you rather have one drowning victim to administer BLS to, or a drowning victim with a lung overexpansion and a second victim (yourself) with a lung overexpansion? I would much rather be the primary rescuer than the second victim.
'PRL:I don't agree 100% on this one. You will do more harm if you become a victim yourself. (but i do agree with the general idea of that statement)
See above.
P.S., PRL, I intend this response to be very much in agreement with what you said, not in contradiction. If I come across harsh, I apologize, but a previous post has really got me set off here, for much the same reasons as you cited in your post.