spoolin01
Contributor
Agreed, a person on the boat wouldn't have been in on what was going on, from what I've understood.I don't think having an extra person on the boat would help in this case (although it would certainly help in others).
What would really help is if training standards were enforced during both training and non-training "lead" dives. Anybody that needs to have someone take them out on a dive, needs to know that their certification limits won't be willfully violated. People qualified (and confident enough) to dive on their own can do what they want.
Terry
My comment on laws about boating-for-scuba and the nexus with the traditional role of a boat captain were a follow-on to the mutely-received earlier observation that a boat captain has responsibility for his passengers. Exactly if and where that leaves off when scuba is involved is clearly ethically contentious in the minds of those here, and apparently legally so. The focus on names and job descriptions for those guys on the boat and in the water who tell you what to do - as if there were even a small likelihood that such definitions would be understood or acknowledged by more than a small percentage of divers, much less that such consensus has risen to where it would be dispositive legally - seems to be getting it backwards to me. Context, expertise, and actions (release forms too) seem likelier to define their legal responsibilities, not some wished-for circumscription of their job description. I haven't done all that many boat dives in different locales with dive op personnel in the water, but in most it was implicit in their conduct at least, as well as usually by direct instruction that they expected me to follow them, not solely for my benefit but also for theirs, logistically and ethically (my inference here - perhaps it was all logistical, they just didn't want me mucking up their schedule!). In some cases it's hard to avoid the impression that the dive profile and forced march are partly intended to allow NDL and/or gas volume to keep the dive to a curt and tidy duration, for instance. This clear dichotomy suggested here between needing or asking to be lead - with the frequent and condescending implication of pathetic dependence - and simply tagging along for sight-seeing doesn't jibe with reality in my experience so far.
As a corollary, the civil disobedience tact - the DM says follow me and you salute then go your merry way, like the Monty Python guards in the tower with the fey prince - and the confusion it must bring to all involved, seems very much out of the spirit of the plan/dive ethic. Maybe I misunderstood the covertness, and you don't just ditch the guy.
I do agree clarifying the roles at the moment of the dive plan is preferable to invoking an SOP that obviously doesn't exist.