At the risk of a slight thread-jacking, why probably backmount over chestmount for cold water wreck diving? (Just curious. If you don't feel like that is an appropriate direction to take this thread, feel free to dm me your response if you want to.)
Of course a "mainstream" chestmount is a possibility. They're rarely seen on big dives as they're quite rare.
Most people dive backmount in sea dives and the boats are geared up for it.
Important point: selecting your rebreather is a long-term decision. You will marry it and stay together for the first couple of hundred hours or more so you learn how to dive CCR. It's often best if you choose one that's common where you dive so you've people who can help you learn how to dive it.
By "mainstream", I mean any rebreather that's commonly available and has sold a lot of units, but most importantly it's a unit that is regularly dived well beyond your limits. For Andrea Doria, that's 80m/260ft. Units would include JJ, Inspiration, X-CCR, Prism, Revo, Meg, etc.
The idea of carrying my bailout on my back and also using that for a diluent source is very attractive. It eliminates an entire tank/valve/first stage assembly which to me says fewer failure points. That's actually something I really like about the DT Go but I realize that the Choptima offers the same solution without the range limitations of the Go.
Bailouts are clipped to you depending on the dive profile. Bailouts should be completely independent (IMHO) such that you can unclip them when they're needed by someone else, or unclip them when not needed (deep bailouts passed up to the boat on a sinker line). More importantly having a separate bailout from your diluent means two separate systems, not two systems sharing a common cylinder (aka dil-out).
Clipping your bailout stages either side and using bungee sidemount style will clean up your profile and makes it much easier when you're penetrating a wreck. They're also more streamlined, so promote easier finning.