Soggy-Soggy:Uh, have you ever taken a GUE course? If not, how can you compare the them? It works both ways....
No - I haven't - due mainly to the fact that I'm a smoker (as I already posted). However I have taken an IANTD course where my instructor made us do an awful lot of fundies work - mainly bouyancy: holding horizontal position with no hand/fin movement 1ft off the silt for 5 minutes/ idem at a given depth in blue water: fin kicks: reels: lift bags: streamlining etc. Now I'm sure it wasn't identical - but it was a lot more than PADI ever taught me - and I KNOW that it improved my diving/diving awareness vastly. The problem here is simple - I have GUE DIR/F divers telling me that what I learnt was not good (or at least my agency - IANTD - quoted by Detroit Diver) : whereas I am personally quite prepared to accept that GUE gives as good a training from what I have read from JJ's book and from what I have read here on SB. I do agree though that it works both ways and while I don't have any information from (for instance) an IANTD trained diver who then did GUE courses - I also don't know any GUE DIR/F divers who did IANTD courses - so I simply ask: what is the comperison based on?
On a side note - an GUE instructor, Sonya Tittle, recently gave some DIR/F courses in Japan in Tokyo and Okinawa. As far as I know she is also an IANTD instructor and after thet GUE courses also did some IANTD ones (at least as far as I understand). This suggests to me that the animosity that seems to exist at a lower level is not always repeated at a higher level.