Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The aqualung style spring-loaded flange auto closure seems to be a better design, but I wouldn't bother with either of them.
I just had a quick look at the website. I have never seen one of these things in person, and I have not looked at a schematic, so take my comments with a grain of salt. They look like a basic MK25/G250 style design, if I had to guess I would say they might be oceanic-made.
In general I have been pretty impressed with DGX products; someone over there seems to really know what they're doing. The wings are good, the lights are good. So I would suspect the regulators are decent as well. The only red flag IMO is the auto-closure feature on the 1st stage. If that is the oceanic design with the little ball-on-a-spring that closes the 1st stage when not pressurized, for me personally that would be a deal breaker. Lots of other divers would be fine with it, but not me because I'm old and grumpy about stupid design crap that doesn't serve a real purpose other than to increase sales. The aqualung style spring-loaded flange auto closure seems to be a better design, but I wouldn't bother with either of them.
The other issue is parts and service availability. Maybe divegearexpress will sell service kits directly to a customer (I don't know) and if that's the case, that's a huge plus IMO. Whatever the situation is, I would not buy any regulator without knowing how it's going to be serviced. Maybe that means sending them back to DGX every few years, maybe it means finding someone locally (someone competent, and that's easier said than done) or maybe it means learning to do it yourself depending on your mechanical aptitude and interest.
I know. I wrote the manual and all the photos were taken by me. Those are my fingers in the photos.