outofofficebrb
HARRO HUNNAYYY
I disagree - there was enough news by March 9 to know traveling internationally was risky - some folks just seem to have poor judgement.
I do feel bad for those stuck and hope they get evacuated (and are then held in strict quarantine for 2-3 weeks before being “let loose”) - hopefully, this is a learning opportunity for any future situations like this.
The level 3 global advisory for non-essential travel wasn’t issued until March 11-12. At that point, people saw it as an advisory and not an outright ban and my guess is many people didn’t want to cancel because they would lose 100% of the money due to “fear or disinclination to travel due to pandemic/epidemic/health situation” (not covered by insurance) and it was still too early for ops to be canceling on them. Most insurance won’t cover health/pandemic/epidemic situations either.
California was the first state to lock down. 7 counties started off in the SF Bay Area in March 17 (announced March 16) and then the rest of the state followed a couple of days after that. The legal order made it a misdemeanor punishable by fine and/or imprisonment to go out for anything other than essentials and maybe a walk or outdoor activity while enforcing social distancing. At that point, I imagine when it was a legal order and not an advisory, that might have also changed many people’s minds. Other cities and states have slowly followed behind that.