- Messages
- 17,332
- Reaction score
- 13,750
- # of dives
- 100 - 199
I agree.I think a lot of it is learned helplessness.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I agree.I think a lot of it is learned helplessness.
Yes, it is.Guess it’s difficult to have non-survivor bias.
Looking back at my log I've done a few of those in the last couple of months. Our gas consumption is low and it's not uncommon to spend a few minutes taking pictures of a small wreck or something towards the bottom of the reef and still end up with a 70-90 minute dive on a single 80 with N32.
At high tide the the wreck sits in 108fsw. It always amazed me that people would do this dive "Normally." on single aluminum 80's without any type of redundancy.
I always thought it was insane????
I've done 180' + dives on a single AL 80 on air. to quote @rhwestfall
QUOTE="rhwestfall, post: 9168407, member: 180653"]I knew little of what I do now....
So you bounced to 40m, were riding NDL, stayed for 57minutes underwater and surfaced with almost a half full AL80. Sure.I was 40 m on a single AL80 yesterday. I bounced to 40 m then back to 30 m and gradually reduced depth to the end of the dive. Surfaced with 90 bar after 57 minutes for a 8.6 l per minute rate. My remaining time never dropped below 2 minutes and was back to 99 by the time I got back to around 15 m.
If I was going to stay at 40 m I would quickly run out of NDL but doing it on a single AL80 is not an issue.
This is just a normal dive.
So I guess you guys don't want to hear about my 220' dive on a single steel 72 in Palau in 1981?![]()