What got me in here was DCBC's pretty adamant stand that one SHOULD train on deep air before being allowed to do the same dives on mix. Personally, I think that is extremely bad advice. ...But holding the position that all people wanting to do deeper dives should train through impairment to somehow "earn" a clear head just doesn't sit well with me at all.
I don't believe I have said that "all people wanting to do deeper dives should train through impairment to somehow "earn" a clear head." You are mistaken.
What I have said:
1. That the OP's view "about deep air and trimix is an old school one. It was how I was taught."
2. That this "opinion was shared by everyone in the recreational diving community not that long ago, not to mention the military and the commercial diving field. This was to "learn the air envelope before moving on to another gas." There is some wisdom to this."
3. "The philosophy to "learn the air envelope before moving on to another gas" was to encouraged the diver to gain progressive underwater depth experience before moving into deeper water."
4. "Learning to deal with an improper mixture has been valuable (to me) at depth."
5. "It is up to each diver to dive within their own capabilities. It is not however up to anyone to suggest what those capabilities may be with further training and experience."
6. "It's about teaching divers to dive their limitations and how to progressively increase them. I believe this is what continuing education is about."
7. "It is that education and experience that prepares me to deal with underwater "situations" in a more competent manner, than I would have been able to, if I hadn't developed these skill-sets. This doesn't put me in a position to say that because of this I'm better than anyone. It is evidence however that I'm better than what I use to be. For me, that's reason enough."
8. "Dealing with nitrogen narcosis has assisted me in understanding how my body is reacting adversely to other conditions; allowing me to report problems or to hold it together long enough to take action."
9. Anyone who hasn't taken the time to learn really doesn't know what they are talking about, but that doesn't mean they can't have an opinion; it's just an unqualified one. I have heard quite a few of these lately surrounding deep air. If deep air is so unsafe, why are organizations like TDI, IANTD, DSAT, CMAS and others running them? Those who feel these organizations are reckless please stand up and be counted.
It does however bother me when someone jumps to conclusions and mistakenly reports "my position" on an issue.
I'd honestly rather see a relatively inexperienced diver at 150 on mix than me at 150 on air. Yes, mix will "let" a diver get to greater depths with less experience than in the "good old days". Yes, that may sometimes be a bad thing.
I wouldn't encourage either without adequate experience and progressive training.