Based on one bad experience is not rational grounds for determining what's good for the vast majority of divers is it?
Gray ... I really take offense at the inference. Nowhere in this conversation have I made any attempt to "determining what's good for the vast majority of divers". You've taken my words completely out of context to make a point you KNOW wasn't the one I was making. Please don't talk to me about weak arguments ... you just made the classic one by making that statement.
Dude, you owe me an apology.
Really, I think drunk driving is off point. No one is doing anything comparable to hurling down the freeway at 60 mph in a 2,000 piece of metal while drunk. To me that analogy speaks of a weak argument. It's often used of course but it's not a great argument.
It's a good argument in this respect ... drunk driving, like narcosis, is a mental impairment. In both cases you have slowed reflexes, a reduced ability to recognize an oncoming problem, and a reduced ability to think through a rational response in a timely manner. That's what the classic narcosis tests are intended to point out to you in deep diving courses.
Nobody's suggesting that you can't adapt to the impairment ... and I've known many drunks who are equally adept at adapting to the impairment ... but they're still impaired.
You are choosing to mix two issues here ... the impairment and the adaptation to impairment. They are very different things.
I don't know if you need to experience deep air before trimix. I do know that it's not accurate to imply that only Thal, DCBC, and less than a dozen people here on SB can function on deep air.
That's not what I implied at all ... I implied that their decades of experience give them the background to have adapted to impairment very well. Less experienced divers may surely adapt ... but probably not to the same degree.
As I KEEP SAYING ... we're all different. Nobody can tell someone else what's right or wrong for them. Some of y'all seem to be taking the same stance you're objecting to ... which is to say that everybody SHOULD BE able to adapt to deep air.
I don't agree.
Due to their experience I'm sure they can do many things at a level beyond the average diver on SB. That much is probably fair to say.
And that's all I said.
Most anyone can function on deeper air, within reason, just as most anyone can do anything else related to scuba diving.
That's where we disagree ... and where YOU become the one "determining what's good for the vast majority of divers".
I'm sure you realize that the events that have taken place at Lobster Shop Wall aren't really much of a test case for or against the progressive use of deep air.
Of course not. Do you honestly think I'm that stupid? Could you possibly be any more condescending?
Please ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)