CptTightPants21
Contributor
But that's not what allegedly happened and even so your example's still not a great way to do things.
My example is exactly what happened only moving one rung up the standard gas ladder. 32% became 21/35, and the 21/35 became 18/45.
Diving two different bottom mixes isn't ideal and it needs to be planned out on deco software, but nothing about this plan is even remotely outrageous. The PPO2 of gases is still 1.4 or less. All of the gases are breathable at every point in the dive. If this was a situation where gas in the backgas was not breathable at certain points in the dive I would be on board with you, but this is not the case. (Ignore hypoxic mixes <3m)
You talk about multiple stages and dpv task loading, that is a separate issue. That is a number of tanks and gear selection issue combined with experience of using all the equipment together. If there was trimix in the bottom stage and back gas you wouldn't have an issue? Your complaint seems go be too much gear, not necessarily the gas choice.
I have seen ccr divers plan dives using 1.3 and 1.4 set points to save on deco. Have seen divers lie about helium percentage on their computers. I would call these normalization of deviance.
I say this is an example GUE diving interacting and blending with the real world practicalities.
If they had been diving 30% nitrox with no helium, would you call it normalization of deviance? If they did put 21/35 in their back gas and then diluted with air on subsequent shallower dives so that it was no longer 21/35 who that be normalization of deviance?
I see lots of references to these hard-core DIR divers and yet most of the GUE divers I see in the wild are far more practical.