I'll hazard a guess that you weren't really "acing" things and that the left-right post confusion wasn't the only issue behind the provisional. But I find the lack of breadth and "drilled down to one event" evaluation disappointing from an agency I otherwise find recommendable.
rjack321, I respect your opinion and really don't want to jack this thread any further to start an agency poo-pooing campaign. I would agree that I wasn't "acing" things - there were otherwise a few fumbles here and there. After all, I had never been in a cave, especially under those simulated conditions. However, I was pretty spot-on where it counted (gas sharing, post shut downs, lost line drills, signaling, light deployment, etc). The instructor indicated that the fumble could have had more serious consequences in real life and I agreed. The fact of the matter is that if he would have just brushed it off, it wouldn't have registered as much as it does now.
I'm not disappointed one bit in the training, the instructor, the agency nor in my final evaluation - SO YOU SHOULDN'T BE ...
After all, I live 5 hours south of cave country, so it's my pleasure to "have" to go back for a few more dives.