Cave fill final gas volume

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

OMG you guys are making this too complicated.

Who wants simple, conservative-minded squide-factors during an actual dive?

It's much more fun to geek out about pointless, theoretical, mathematical pressure differences that are far too tiny to be measured accurately with the instrumentation produced for divers, especially given minuscule differences in tank manufacturing and which are heavily dependent upon variables like temperatures (which can frequently shift even mid-dive - think thermoclines and haloclines).

It's much, much more sensible to plan your rule of thirds based on what you actually have based on those careful mathematics based on actual gas behaviours rather than imprecise ideal gas laws. That way you can decide whether to split 107 cf into thirds instead of 116. That's a difference of a whole extra 3cf that could be used for an entire minute's penetration to be considered!
 
Who wants simple, conservative-minded squide-factors during an actual dive?

It's much more fun to geek out about pointless, theoretical, mathematical pressure differences that are far too tiny to be measured accurately with the instrumentation produced for divers, especially given minuscule differences in tank manufacturing and which are heavily dependent upon variables like temperatures (which can frequently shift even mid-dive - think thermoclines and haloclines).

It's much, much more sensible to plan your rule of thirds based on what you actually have based on those careful mathematics based on actual gas behaviours rather than imprecise ideal gas laws. That way you can decide whether to split 107 cf into thirds instead of 116. That's a difference of a whole extra 3cf that could be used for an entire minute's penetration to be considered!

Exactly. And tacos if someone's diving 80s. You forgot the tacos.
 
Exactly. And tacos if someone's diving 80s. You forgot the tacos.
Did I?

Which of us is having tacos in Playa for lunch in a few minutes?
 
We went to the moon using Imperial, works just fine.
You didn't though...
The calculations were done in metric but the values displayed to the astronauts were in imperial, because apparently it's easier to train an american how to travel in a spacecraft to the moon than it is to teach them the metric system.
In other words, the metric/imperial debate in SCUBA seems pretty much useless as no one is going to change. :)
 
O yea, we did. Several times.
Here’s the source code…


You are perpetuating a myth.
 
We went we used imperial I don't care what a UK news outlet says. :funny:
 

Back
Top Bottom