Trying to differentiate between cause and effect in historical markets is tough enough without trying to predict them in future markets, so we can agree to disagree on how theyd react to stabilized prices.H2Andy:i'm sorry, that doesn't work. you know why? because energy use is not stable in the future. rather, energy prices today dicate energy uses tomorrow. stable, cheaper prices today will lead to investment in energy-consuming areas, which will then increase the demand for more energy which will lead to higher prices.
lol i'm not saying it worked. i'm saying that if you want to really screw up the market, artificially inflate (ration) or deflate (added reserves) the price of avilable oil and you'll see what happens.
adding more reserves to the market will just lower the price of energy, which will increase consumption, which will drive supply down, which will lead to an increase in price all over again ... and all you've done is raise the baseline at which the need for oil rests
Raising the baseline price of energy will encourage conservation, but the problem is that if the baseline goes up and remains unstable it can damage the economy, while a stable baseline price can safely be higher without upsetting the rest of the economy.
The most important question is what will this do to the price of airfills and if the LDS goes out of business will it matter.
