Yeah, only way to get water inside a tank is through the compressor....
View attachment 492005
You can see all the piting even from the picture, and yes, that little mound there is salt
View attachment 492006
Different tank from same person, can’t remember if there was piting yet on this one, these pics are from 2012, but you can see the same amount of salt here.
View attachment 492012
This is from a few months ago, and that’s just what I was able to colllect for the picture, total amount was nearly twice that.
View attachment 492011 View attachment 492010 View attachment 492009
These were all taken today, 3 different tanks from the same person, batch of 6 tanks.
These tanks were inspected by us 13 months ago, and were spotless then, even now they look brand new (aside from the pitted spots of course), they haven’t even had their first hydro yet.
This is what 1 year will do to a tank, imagine longer, and that’s considering the problems started to occur imisiately after service, but we don’t know that, the actual time to get that damage could be much shorter.
So, where’s this bs of “no evidence of increased safety” by inspecting every year come from, I still haven’t got an answer about how they arrived at that conclusion.
Now, by what some of you are listing here as costs for these services is just outrageous, I think that’s the issue needs to be adressed, not lowering the safety standards.
And yeah, as some have pointed out, so much misinformation here