Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Mr.X:It has the screw-on cover.So I figure it is a BRUT with he advertising missing. Dave4868: Five dollars at an estate sale. Hope I didn't pay too much. Ha!
Dave4868: Five dollars at an estate sale. Hope I didn't pay too much. Ha!
5.00 is a good deal. If the cover has a pin/latching mechanism on the front it's a very old model from the early 90's.
Also, IMO experience I wouldn't use a Sherwood reg. for very technical applications. Deep diving comes to mind. They work very well as recreational regulators. They were very, very simple to service at one time. I haven't followed the trend with these regs. beyond the late 90's.
Here is a link to a site with all the regulator manuals. Sherwood is well represented.
Hopefully this is good help for you.
www.frogkick.dk - /manuals/
Stu
I'm definitely getting old, ha, ha! I was thinking that time period was "more recent", especially since my Sherwoods are older.
I can't argue with this, since I don't know Sherwood's technical specs for air output for "deep diving". No doubt, you're right, since one doesn't hear of Sherwood being a popular tech choice.
I suppose the aspect here is whether the regulator could be "overbreathed" beyond a certain depth, not reliability, right?
Mine have been good breathers down to 180', but I wasn't breathing hard. Reliability has been flawless. And you're right about them being simple to service. I believe current models are basically the same design and just as simple.
Anybody got any references to overbreathing tests or output tests comparing regulators?
Just curious.
Dave C