headhunter:
I just quickly glanced at a small array of different dive tables and it appears that they all agree that anything after a 12 hour surface interval is not considered a repetitive dive.
No more than a handful of tables were used when I did my quick check and I do not have any RGBM tables. I would be interested in seeing those some day. I think everything I have is based on the US Navy tables.
...
That is correct as far as I know. But I have corresponded with SUUNTO and their computer uses 99 hours in its calculations if I remember right. That question came up after a night dive followed by a dive the next day about 13 or so hours after the night dive. The computer gave less bottom time than the other divers who had not been diving the night before.
Now, given that as beach divers we run the following DCI risk as a normal course of diving:
1. We wear dark rubber suits in the sun and walk quite a ways to get to the dive site. If there is a SI, we are often out in the open with no shade for that hour. Dehydration is always a risk.
2. We climb down and back up stairs (if we are luckily) or steep hillsides or cliffs to go diving. DocDeco has written about this and he recommends you don't even change tanks out for 1 hour after a dive, and avoiding strenuous exercise for 6 hours after a dive. Yeah, right, like we ever do that.
So taking into account the two items above, adding to the mix diving two or more times a day, and several days in a row with some of those dives pushing the NDL, should we not start factoring in the previous days dives and back off the NDL a bit?
Now about the Navy dive tables. How were they derived? Was it through scientific study? How long ago and what was the level of knowledge and instrumentation at that time? Military tables are obviously meant to be used by military divers who, one would assume, are in good shape and young (18-25) with a military mission to accomplish. That may mean (but I do not know one way or the other) that they are more aggressive than might be good for a diver of age 50 or so. I will agree they are a place to start.
Finally, if dives over 12 hours no longer are a factor, then why the 24 hour no fly recommendation? I wonder if the dives of the previous 24 to 48 hours were deep dives (70-130 feet) and particularly ones that run on the long side then should we somehow factor them in? The long deep dives would I would think load the slow tissues which by definition do not quickly off gas would become a factor.
So what is the right answer? I don't know, thats why I asked the question.