livinoz
Contributor
- Messages
- 4,129
- Reaction score
- 0
On the other hand, we can just be irrational and cling to an idea without trying to understand why.
Like not trying to understand someone's beliefs, culture, or superstitions, if you like?

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
On the other hand, we can just be irrational and cling to an idea without trying to understand why.
I've read here for a while too, and can I just say I believe that there is a whole range of empirical knowledge not "based" on the scientific method; oral knowledge predated written by some millennia. And "superstitions", whether we personally believe them or not, usually have some historical or cultural basis. The thing with Western cultures is that we need that written, reproducible proof, and when we come up against something that we don't understand, we discount it as being "unscientific" and therefore false. For a good, reproducible proof, look at the Micronesian navigators, who pass down the most intricate knowledge with no written records at all.
I think respect for other cultures and beliefs, as Teamcasa has said, is important. And maybe the inital "banana" problem was more in the method of asking than in what was asked.
I think most people can agree that bananas are not magical. Therefor why should we respect the belief of someone who thinks they are?
More importantly, why should we place our trust in this individual?
I accept the tradition vs. superstition argument.
No matter how extraordinary the claim, nor the lack of evidence to prove it true, some people are willing to believe just about anything. They are willing to accept the wildest theories as true, without checking to see if they conflict with everything else they know about the way the world operates. It's not that these people are stupid, but on these matters they are certainly willfully ignorant. They've suspend their disbelief on matters they should rightfully be skeptical about.
On a side note, I happen to know the micronesian navigator who recently led the Yap group to Palau, sans any modern navigation equipment. 100% traditional method. He's going to teach a celestial navigation course here this fall that I'm going to take. Pretty cool.
Would you say the same thing if there was a cross, Star of David, or Virgin Mary statue at the gate when you got on the boat?
More importantly, why should we place our trust in this individual?
So anyone who has an irrational (to you) belief should not be trusted? Would you hold the same feeling the banana incident happened on the 20th or 50th satisfactory trip with this captain, with you never knowing he had this superstition?
I look at it this way: he is so focused on safety that he is covering all the bases. Now, except for maybe being a bit hungry, I am free to dive and enjoy the trip.
As an ex-Merchant Marine officer, I'll add one more seagoing tradition: No Whistling On Board!. The bosun at the Maritime Academy explained that this stemmed from the days of sailing ships, and whistling was thought call up a storm. He was dead serious, and if he heard you whistling onboard you'd be VERY sorry
Oh, and as a boat owner in Hawaii: NO BANANAS ON BOARD MY BOAT!!!Seriously. Leave them at home. Women are however just fine
(Wife is co-owner of the boat).