- Messages
- 16,510
- Reaction score
- 5,297
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Steve, An interesting side issue you brought up. Killing for a purpose (food) vs. harassing or even killing for fun (tease the octopus). Some have told me over the years (in person and on SB) that killing for food is fine. Taking a shell and boiling it for your collection is not. My slanted take on it is that if, instead of all the reckless forms of commercial fishing we've done--for food (except for the wasteful bycatch), we simply took half that many fish from the oceans and dumped them in a field in Kansas, the big fish populations would be a heck of a lot better.I am aware of the affects of stress which is why I try to be careful with what I do and do not do. Earlier in my life I spent a lot of time surface fishing from shore and boats. I did not kill unless food (or bait). I caught and released a lot of (stressed) fish. But I will be honest. it was for my amusement and personal satisfaction. I had no need for additional protein or calories in my diet. I was not a subsistance fisherman. In fact, I would be better off with less food.
As well with fishing, though I have always followed the rules and daily limits in fresh/salt water, I catch fish strictly to eat them. It is curious to me why someone would ever catch and release a fish on purpose, with the definite possibility of injuring the fish physically (if not mentally, since we all worry so much about animals being so shocked they must seek therapy). Yes, the battle to land the fish can be a challenge, as can hunting Moose, I presume. Lot of ways to look at these things I guess.