- Messages
- 22,171
- Reaction score
- 2,796
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
My understanding is that you need 4meg to roughly equal film.
Are 2.1 megapixels sufficient for underwater photography?
- Thread starter rcoltura
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
AndyT
Contributor
2002 feels like a decade ago !!!!
The image below is from a 5 MP camera (5060) - I cropped away around 50% of the original pic.
I guess by today's standards you should be looking at around 7 MP.
And yes I am bored otherwise I wouldn't be responding.
The image below is from a 5 MP camera (5060) - I cropped away around 50% of the original pic.
I guess by today's standards you should be looking at around 7 MP.
And yes I am bored otherwise I wouldn't be responding.
Arcaporale
Contributor
Depends on what you mean by sufficient. Yes it will takes pictures, just don't expect to win any awards. For some decent shots you should have at least a 4.
I need to look closer at what I am responding to. Thanks Alcina!alcina:BTW - thread is from 2002 - doubt many are still using a 2MP
Similar threads
