Hoosier
Contributor
- Messages
- 5,974
- Reaction score
- 9
Oregon Duck:Your analogy is inapt and inept. Learn the truth about the case here:
http://www.marlerblog.com/2006/07/articles/case-news/the-truth-about-the-mcdonalds-hot-coffee-case/
No… …. I don’t think so.. Why?
“It should have been a warning.” LOL~~~~
I read the link you post and my argument is still same. What other facts were new on that article? The primary fact (can’t be changed) was that the coffee was hot no matter what other previous reports we had. Am I right?
Everybody knows that the coffee is hot as it is supposed to be. It is made of the boiling water. It is common sense that people should be careful. If you try to find more cases and causal relationship due to a hot coffee, it is also an endless list.
In the same context, why don’t you sue against the ramen company? The ramen is supposed to be served with hot boiled water. Yes, water is supposed to 212 degree to cook. Don’t you think there is no burning accident due to hot ramen soup?
How about a stomach cancer? The recent studies show that the hot and spicy food increases a stomach cancer risk. So, you might to prepare for the law suit against any Indian and Mexican food or restaurant.
How about a hamburger? Many medical studies warned that too many hamburgers increase a cholesterol rate and induce a heart attack. Gee~~ someone already sued that.
You can sue anyone, make a case, and name a causal relationship, but it doesn’t’ mean it is valid, even in the common sense perspective. It is totally BS. Why do you think that McDonald’s case is so popular around world? Don’t know that it is a typical example to make fun of U.S. law system and practice. Do you want an on-going example? Check out this: Judge sues cleaner for $65M over pants
As for the scuba industry, to dive at any dive sites where are being run for a commercial base, especially in U.S. territory, to sign on the waive form is mandatory without exception. Even, some waive forms ask to put an initial every clauses and sentences. If the waive form isn’t enough to cover the owner’s ***, what other things does he/she need?
Even though the owner did nothing wrong, he/she keeps being worried about his/her *** thanks to the funny law cases such as a McDonald’s coffee. Do you think why?
Mike checks a deep dive plan in advance? It is for fun?
It is all about CYA and to keep the insurance cost down. Am I wrong?
Yes, my point is that it is because of an ambulance lawyer and insurance company who have been only successful to utilize the current law system in U.S.
It looks like you are a lawyer... Let's have your point....