Nothing to do with thought police. Telling people in a public place how to do gas planning is asinine. People read this stuff and won't fully understand but are under these impression they do. Some of them go out and 'self train' based on what they read. We have seen a bunch of accidents where people have done stuff they clearly haven't been trained for... you don't think there were reading about it on the internet or watching youtube videos?
Not too long ago there was a video about how you do a traverse in manatee. There is a video by a well known instructor showing how you 'can't go hypoxic' on a ccr. There is a video online were a cave diver explains why he uses a air as shallow dilout on a 230' cave dive.There are many of those examples.
What the upside in explaining to untrained people how to do something they shouldn't be doing? I only see a bunch of downsides.
IMHO a cave forum is not for OW diver to get help in DIY cave training.
A valid philosophical point; should you discuss dangerous processes in public, or should you keep it behind closed doors.
I cannot speak for others. I personally want as much information as I can lay my hands upon in order to understand what the issues are and THINK about the consequences. Part of learning is to consider many options and opinions. I really struggle when I get told: "that is how you must do it" without the full explanation behind it. My fun-dies course was like that and it put me off of that style of training forever. Sure, I knew three-fifths of nothing about diving at the time, but I find that arrogant and patronising.
I want to know, for example, how some massive cave penetration gas planning was done as it's both interesting and informative; it rounds out one's knowledge as one progresses through the levels.
Also, it's great background reading for when you're faced with a person arguing from another perspective. Do they really know, or are they, errm, exaggerating.
In the case of gas planning for technical diving, it's generally a pretty simple process with little rocket science involved. The problem is always the fallbacks, not to mention logistics -- excellent example in that sad thread where a person died toxing.
What's bad is when there's no information for me to validate my plan -- based upon training -- against other examples.