LeadTurn_SD
Contributor
Halemano, I love that picture of you and your dad (I've seen you post it before).
Best wishes.
Best wishes.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Then you best be prepared to not teach anyone under 25, that's a fact of brain growth and development....they don't understand how it applies to them.
Terry
Using agency standards as training recommendations is like using the FDA Maximum Food Contaminant Levels as recommendations for cooking. They're limits, not optimal levels.
From my perspective, letting any child into the water with SCUBA gear is a bad move, with or without an instructor.
Young children still think there are monsters under the bed and that Santa-Claus comes down the chimney. They have no concept that holding their breath at the wrong time could be fatal, and although some have a minor grasp on the concept of death, they don't understand how it applies to them.
Terry
I'm not going to state this as a hard and fast rule, but somehow holding their breath and embolising seems to be an adult phenomena.
It reminds me of a story... he took a dog from the Harvard Dog Lab down in the "wandering bell" at the Submarine Escape Training Tower at the New London Submarine Base and tossed the dog out. The dog made it to the surface without any problem.
Standards are there so that adequate guidance is provided for non-experts to be able to make the "good" decisions, not necessarily "best" decisions. Standards are sometimes there because someone wrote them, nothing more, the mere existance of a standard, especially a propriatary standard, does not meam that the author(s) posses any comprehension of, "the summation of diving experience."
You must be new here ... there are things I simply don't post on ScubaBoard anymore because I got tired of being judged by all the 50-dive "experts".
Liability does not come from simply injury, it comes from neglegent practice with respect to a duty. I see no problem here, unless the equipment that was provided was defective in some fashion.
I despise PADI and SSI since I have dived with them and I loathe the pump out cert card ideas that a lot of instructors have. As long as he meets the standards, he passes and gets his cert. follow the standards. standards standards standards thats all I tend to hear from these people and I thoroughly disagree.
...lets say a very very experienced diver who knows a thing or two about rescue but isnt a certified professional to supervise a young diver wannabe in a shallow pool? Yes this is a what if question but I'm just wondering if your penchant for standards will disallow this since its technically incorrect.
Washington most definitely has a Good Samaritan Law ...Also I'm not sure about Washington where I am now, but Ontario where I'm from had a Good Samaritan Law (not the Seinfeld type)
Then you best be prepared to not teach anyone under 25, that's a fact of brain growth and development.
Of course ... and in time (perhaps this time) he will learn to simply not discuss things that might elicit controversy on this board ... like I did.The OP (in his original post) expected negative comments. He made the choice to make the post.
Not knowing all the details ... and not knowing the child ... the OP didn't really give us enough information to determine whether or not this was an irresponsible act. There's been a awful lot of assuming in this thread, and ... well ... we all know about assume.In diving, people get hurt; it's not some big joke. In life its been my experience that if you act irresponsibly, it's just a matter of time before it bites you in the *ss.