Matthew
Contributor
Good points, lolo Pao.
Personally, I believe the Dive and Trek environment is very forgiving - easy entries and exits, no significant current, usually decent vis, easy to navigate, etc. - so that dives can be safely planned, conducted and enjoyed with just the basic skills and knowledge gained from well taught OW/AOW courses, and not necessarily the high level of meticulous planning and precision execution associated with DIR. IMO everybody should strive to eventually be able to plan and execute dives without a DM, and D&T is a perfect place to learn that.
I'm much more concerned with the physiology. I think the planned 10 dives in one day, together with the concomitant short surface intervals, multiple ascents and descents, cold and fatigue, amount to pushing the limits, for which purpose the tables we use may not be designed nor thoroughly tested. I'm definitely not an expert, but it is often said that decompression is not an exact science, and I think that as we go towards the direction of the extreme, the inaccuracy of the tables is amplified and our individual physiological differences become more of a factor. One extreme example is deep record diver Mark Elyatt who IIRC used a certain deco software for dives to depths beyond which it has been tested, and is now blaming the proprietor after he got bent bad.
I'm sure Carlo as well as Chip can pull this off safely, they are physically fit, are used to diving more aggressively than most of us and most important of all, possess the knowledge and skills to plan the dives and to adhere strictly to the plan. Pao is correct when he advised other participants to get involved in planning the dives and not just tag along. I would just like to add that in planning, each one should take into consideration his/her own personal limitations and level of comfort. It is easy enough to plan 10 dives within the tables, but dont let that give anybody a false sense of total security.
Personally, I believe the Dive and Trek environment is very forgiving - easy entries and exits, no significant current, usually decent vis, easy to navigate, etc. - so that dives can be safely planned, conducted and enjoyed with just the basic skills and knowledge gained from well taught OW/AOW courses, and not necessarily the high level of meticulous planning and precision execution associated with DIR. IMO everybody should strive to eventually be able to plan and execute dives without a DM, and D&T is a perfect place to learn that.
I'm much more concerned with the physiology. I think the planned 10 dives in one day, together with the concomitant short surface intervals, multiple ascents and descents, cold and fatigue, amount to pushing the limits, for which purpose the tables we use may not be designed nor thoroughly tested. I'm definitely not an expert, but it is often said that decompression is not an exact science, and I think that as we go towards the direction of the extreme, the inaccuracy of the tables is amplified and our individual physiological differences become more of a factor. One extreme example is deep record diver Mark Elyatt who IIRC used a certain deco software for dives to depths beyond which it has been tested, and is now blaming the proprietor after he got bent bad.
I'm sure Carlo as well as Chip can pull this off safely, they are physically fit, are used to diving more aggressively than most of us and most important of all, possess the knowledge and skills to plan the dives and to adhere strictly to the plan. Pao is correct when he advised other participants to get involved in planning the dives and not just tag along. I would just like to add that in planning, each one should take into consideration his/her own personal limitations and level of comfort. It is easy enough to plan 10 dives within the tables, but dont let that give anybody a false sense of total security.