I never said it was for tech
The Shearwater predator is a tech computer, and most of its features have no function in the recreational sport diving community. By naming that computer, you implied that you meant tech.
A lot of people in this thread have used the term "failure point." I would respectfully submit that this is not the proper term. The proper term is "failure pointS." Like all tech computers, the Predator follows multiple gases. If I am diving with, say, back gas and three other bottles with three different mixes, the Predator tracks them all. If it is a fully functioning AI computer, I will need a transmitter on each one of those tanks. That's 4 transmitters that could break if I hit something with them. That's 4 transmitters that have to synch properly to the computer without getting mixed up. But 4 isn't the limit on the Predator--it could be more.
And what would I gain from all of that? How would my dive experience be better? Can you list the benefits that would make all that worthwhile?
Now think of it from Shearwater's point of view. To make a multi-gas/multiple transmitter AI addition to the Predator would take an enormous increase in technology. It would take a lot of expensive research and development, costing them a whole lot of money. The final product would be much more expensive than the current version. So now how to they market a much more expensive computer that adds multiple failure points while providing no real benefit to the tech diving community?