A coward. Ok. That's real impressive and noble of you NetDoc. Without even so much as discussing it with me or asking for examples you are going to assume that I have no evidence to submit, and call me a coward in the meantime. Ok. I'll post some examples. You will obviously not look into them and that's fine. But, I'm a retired, wounded Marine. I've defended your right to act like this, been in harms way and suffered for it so that you have the right to call me a coward...from behind the protection of your computer screen. Rather than respond with the same lack of integrity, I'll post the examples you asked for.
Trouble Contacting Blue XT Sea
That thread had the title modified by a mod because he felt it was unfair to Blue XT Sea. Read the thread. The poster wasn't being unfair to BXTS, she was stating the problem she had with them. Why would a mod modify a title to reflect better on a company? There was nothing rude about the title. There was nothing against the TOS in it. Why would a mod get involved?
Bill,
You addressed this to Pete, but I'm going to add my viewpoint and attempt to answer your questions. First off, I reviewed the thread you posted the link to. That thread is over a year old. I was not a Mod at the time it happened and I have no affiliations with any of the dive ops so I believe my opinion is about as unbiased as you can get.
The title was changed by a staff member, but they were not a Mod. They are no longer a staff member and I cannot speak for their reasoning in changing the title. Based on the OP's problem, my
guess is that it was done to facilitate someone helping them figure out how to get in contact with BlueXTSea, as that is the problem they stated they were having. The OP also stated they received a notification from the staff member who made the change and they were ok with it being done. If they objected, I'm reasonably certain it would have been reversed.
Why did the Mod lock that thread after Christi requested it? So that the discussion would end? Why?
The thread was not locked based on Christ's request. The OP stated they couldnt get in touch with BlueXTSea, who responded. The OP stated that the problem was resolved:
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/3990494-post19.html
and expressed displeasure at the reaction of other posters twisting her post:
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/3991280-post26.html
After that, the thread side tracked from the original topic and was shut down because the question had been addressed. It was suggested that anyone who wished to continue the debate on which op was better to dive with should start a new thread. This is not an uncommon practice.
The next question you have to ask, is why didn't the mod then modify or lock this one:
Dive With Martin Hmmm.
That post is far more damaging and attack oriented than the one about Christi's blowing off a client and then attacking them in a scathing email. DWM was being hammered in that thread, but did a Mod get involved? Nope. Did it get locked? Nope. And it should not have been...its a discussion between divers about a dive op. Each sharing their views, on a webboard. The problem is, when the same discussion happens with BXTS as the subject the thread title is censored, the thread is locked or deleted altogether. Explain that to me Doc.
I haven't read that thread yet, so I will refrain from commenting on the content. I will say that Mods generally only get involved in threads when users report issues with them and when the issues warrant a response. We don't just randomly go around moderating threads at whim. Once again my
guess without reading the thread (yet) is that for some reason people get more passionate about BlueXTSea (good or bad) leading to more moderation. Disagreement is fine, but some users can't seem to do so without insults or name calling. At some point if we can't keep putting out the fires, it's time to remove the fuel.
Other examples are harder to come by because the threads have been deleted. You run this board, so you have more access than I do behind the front page. Can you recover deleted posts? The only proof that a member like me can offer that threads are being deleted that cast a negative light on the advertiser (that you assert isn't advertising here) is if you click on my Thanks to the left. The number of Thanks counted to the left doesn't equal the number you can read in my profile. It's tedious, but if you click on each and count the multiples there are half a dozen missing. Why...because those threads are gone. They were not my threads. I didn't start them, but when Christi and her minions descend upon someone who voiced a complaint about her service...I would post that I had the same problem and those people would throw me a thanks. Then...the thread is deleted. Not locked. Not moved. Deleted. Why?
I did research this before responding. You have missing thanks because a thread was deleted. That thread had numerous insults, name calling and accusations in it despite
repeated Mod warnings from several different Mods about it. As I said previously, if we can't put out the fires, it's time to remove the fuel.
Any discussion of BXTS that is not flowery and pretty very quickly ends up censored, moved, locked or gone.
When people can't play nice, they lose the privilege to play. Again, I'm not familiar with BXTS, so I can't comment on what seems to stir people up about them so much. But when a thread gets off track and reported it will be addressed, no matter who it is about.
I run a business and understand that people working for me often do things that I would not approve of. Sometimes I hear about those things and am forced by conscience to look into them, to see if anything has been done by my company that is improper. A lessor leader simply jumps to his people's defense without so much as a look to see if they actually may have done something wrong. A lessor man attacks those who point out an irregularity, calls them names from behind the protection of a keyboard rather than look into the accusation.
Do you attest that you know about the friendships of every one of your mods? Do you believe that a mod couldn't do what I'm saying without your knowledge? If you believe that every one of the mods you've ever had is as pure as the driven snow, then so be it. I don't believe it.
The post you referenced first was over a year ago. Some of the staff involved in those decisions are no longer staff. All of the staff are human and make mistakes. I can't speak for anyone but myself, but no, I'm not as pure as the driven snow and I also don't let friendships affect my duties as a Mod. I have moderated SEVERAL of my friends on the board when the situation called for it. I have also recused myself from several instances when I didn't think that I could do so fairly. I feel pretty confident in saying that most of the active Mods currently on staff are the same way. Many of the moderating decisions that I have seen during my tenure are discussed first, not just knee jerk reactions except in the case of blatant violations.
I hope this answers some of your concerns and I for one, appreciate your service that allows us the freedom to have such discussions.