I understand this in principle. The important question is whether or not people have fit and comfort issues with the plates they have. I don't, personally. Are you solving a problem that exists or creating one that you have a solution for? The trade off of "improved comfort" over "reduced flexibility to standardize my kit" is a tradeoff that divers will have to evaluate.
As you said, some GUE/DIR divers are using your kit. Clearly it can be incorporated by trained DIR divers. It may be tricky to get by in a class with one but I'm pretty sure most of us take what we're trained in, pass it through a filter of what makes sense to us and then adapts our personal diving around those tweaks.
Most folks are not robots manufactured in a GUE training factory.
It's not that standard plates don't work, it's that there's a plate for singles that IMO works better.
It would be like driving a car with no power steering or power brakes for years, yes it works. But then when you drive a car with power steering
and power brakes and get used to it it becomes very hard to go back. But if you never drove a car with power steering and power brakes you wouldn't know what they are like.
So I didn't solve any particular problem per say, I just improved on something.
Seats in cars back in the old days worked but seats now are far superior in fit and comfort with lumbar support, side support, and overall ergonomics. A milk crate works too but the most modern improved designs work better.
So in my thinking, if somebody has chosen the option of just single tank diving or having a single tank only rig all set up why not have one that works better and is more comfortable, providing that they have the extra cash to buy a separate rig.
Does $200 seem a lot for a single tank only plate?
Dan was advocating having two H plates all set up ready to go, one for doubles and one for singles, just for the convenience of saving some time. Hey, he's got the cash so why not?
Well then why not make the single rig a Freedom Plate instead of another H plate? the price is the same but the freedom plate works better for singles, but you wouldn't know that because you've never tried one.
I want people to do an experiment, if they have the time.
Take a plain standard plate with no webbing on it, just the bare plate, and set it on a friends back where you would normally set the plate. move it around and press it firmly onto the person you're using as a model Move it up and down and rock it like a teeter totter on their shoulder blades. Notice the angle at which the plate is sitting when it is resting below the shoulder blades on the inverted slope of your subjects back. Raise the plate up and try to angle it on the shoulder blades to make it straight with the axis of your models average verticle line. You'll see that the plate will only contact the shoulder blades leaving the top and bottom of the plate not touching the back. This is because the plate is straight up and down and your back has two basic angles (we learned this in art class). From the peak of the shoulder blades to the base of the neck is one general plain which slopes inward at the top. And the other area from the peak of the shoulder blades down to the small of the back is the other plain. So from the side you see what looks like low lying mountain turned 90 degrees.
If you also notice, you will see there is a valley in between the shoulder blades which is substantially lower that the peak of the shoulder blades.
This is the gradual and steady curve of the spinal area. The shape from the neck down to the lower back forms a nice gradual S shape.
What I did with the Freedom Plate was to narrow it down to get inside of the shoulder blades and I shaped it to fit the gradual S curve of the spinal area so that the plate contacts the entire surface of where it sits to distribute the weight and pressure of the rig. Along with the narrowing I also widened the waist area so that it would cradle the waist area and reduce sideways sliding of the rig, so in essence it "grips" a little bit giving it stability.
The problem with standard plates for single tanks is that they are too wide and they are straight up and down and don't fit the shape of the human back. If you were to try and ride them up onto the shoulder blades they would cause a really bad pinch and pressure on the shoulder blade making it painfull. SO people ride them down low on the lower slope of the back. However if you look at the angle to which the plate is sitting the top is sticking way out form the diver and the bottom is pointing in pressing in on the butt. This doesn't look comfortable to me or very ergonomic.
If you don't have a Freedom Plate to compare you'll just have to use you imagination.
To add an additional level of improved tank attitude or angle, I kicked the bottom of the tank out just about 1.25" or approx. 3 degrees to set the tank in line with the straight line verticle axis of the body. Combine this with dropping it into the valley between the blades and you have a very snug, low profile, low drag, slick setup.
I had to throw out all the concepts of a standard plate, which wasn't even desinged originally to be used with singles, and completely start over.
My intention was to really think about it and create a plate that addressed all the issues I saw in the current flawed design.
The Freedom plate is the result of reverse engineering from the standpoint of where I wanted the tank to sit on my body and how to acheive that with a new support system. My original intention had nothing to do with trying to make it look retro or old school, is just so happens that it does look similar. That is the end result of deducting and distilling the design down around the shape of the body around the bones, following the contour of the back, etc. and this what it is ended up looking like. Just like putting a car into a wind tunnel and doing tests, did you ever think a car would look like it does to be more aerodynamic?
I get a chuckle with the original back packs, I guess they had it right the first time, but marketing and politics wiped it out.