cinder4320
Contributor
visibilityunlimited:Everyone seems top be talking from an emergency responder point of view. What would you want to happen if you were the patient?
I don't see questioning who to call first as disrepecting the value of life. Its my own life I am thinking about here. Yes, I would be in debt forever if it meant living but the purpose of paying DAN ahead of time is to alleviate this. Its two different arguments and questions. One "what is the value of a life" and two "why should one have supplemental emergency insurance that is not valid in a true emergency".
I am looking at this from the perspective of a diver who is paying a monthly fee for piece of mind should an incident occur only to find out that if proper procedure isn't followed I will not be covered. If in a true emergency someone calls rescue other than DAN and I am airlifted without DAN arrangements and have to pay a lot of money, why do I use their insurance at all? Its a false piece of mind as ahead of time I feel covered and protected but am realizing that I might not be. An insurance company that requires procedures that may not be in the best interest of the patient doesn't seem right.
I may be off base here but everything I am reading is saying you MUST call DAN to arrange ANY kind of transport if you want it covered. DAN also states that one should call 911 of coast guard if it is a life threatening emergency for immediate airlifting/rescue. DAN then states that immediate rescue not arranged through them will not be covered. So DAN is in essence by this reasoning stating that they do not cover emergencies since they recommend emergencies be handled through 911/CG and they do not reimburse for this. Why exactly do I have their insurance then?
I've been trying to find actual facts from DAN on this but am coming to a dead end and have only found what I've posted so far. Does anyone have the final facts on how to handle emergencies where time is of the essence and get it to be covered?
Miranda