OP
oahu_diver
Guest
Seems like just semantics to me. It could easily be said that PADI/NAUI/CMAS (and all the others) don't certify either. The instructor certifies and verifies the student's training to the agency who then sends a card.
PADI:
1. Instructor conducts the training
2. Instructor verifies training to PADI
3. Student receives card
AAUS:
1. DSO conducts training
2. DSO verifies training to AAUS
3. Student receives card
What's the difference other than calling it a certification, qualification or verification? Seems like lawyer talk to avoid some liabilities.
And if a scientific diver is longer affiliated with the institutions that "verified" the training, then those cards aren't valid and you are not considered an "active" scientific diver. Am I understanding that correctly? Can I assume you remain part of that national registry, but listed as inactive??
I hope this isn't frustrating you, I'm just trying to get a good understanding.
PADI:
1. Instructor conducts the training
2. Instructor verifies training to PADI
3. Student receives card
AAUS:
1. DSO conducts training
2. DSO verifies training to AAUS
3. Student receives card
What's the difference other than calling it a certification, qualification or verification? Seems like lawyer talk to avoid some liabilities.
And if a scientific diver is longer affiliated with the institutions that "verified" the training, then those cards aren't valid and you are not considered an "active" scientific diver. Am I understanding that correctly? Can I assume you remain part of that national registry, but listed as inactive??
I hope this isn't frustrating you, I'm just trying to get a good understanding.