Hey UnderExposed great to see you back in this discussion. Nice to have people like you and ItsBruce with the high standard of your legal qualifications active on this topic.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Perhaps Tina's parents, and others, need to prepare for the possibility that in fact Watson did not do it. I'm not sure what be worse for them though, to have the charges dismissed BEFORE a trial, or for Watson to be found not guilty AFTER a trial. I suspect that if he walks free by either route, they will not be satisfied. Presumably they're not too happy that the death penalty is off the table to begin with.
I think it would be too much to ask of Tina's parents to not believe what they believe in light of the fact that they have seen the evidence, seen Watson's behavior first-hand, heard all the testimony at the coroner's inquest, talked to investigators and people involved, as we, the public have not. Tina's father is the one who talked to his daughter about the insurance and has a sense of her feeling on the matter of not only what she said, but how she said it and even though it may not be admissible in a court of law, certainly something I could not dismiss in my own mind if I were her parent. No one who is not privy to all the evidence should tell Tina's family what to believe and most especially if there is to be no trial where the evidence is never heard.
As far as the outcome is concerned and Tina's family reaction, your presumption is incorrect. Here are Tina's father's exact words on the matter:
MR. THOMAS: "What we want is for him to stand before a jury for the very first time, before that evidence and answer to it. Whatever a judge and jury decide as the outcome of that trial should be true justice. And it doesn't matter to us the sentencing, what that sentence would be as long as it is a just sentence.."
Source: Australia 'Honeymoon Killer': Father of Allegedly Murdered Bride Tina Watson Seeks Justice - ABC News
Another quote from Tina's father:
"Whether it be the death penalty or life in prison, without parole, really is immaterial to us," he said. "The fact of the matter...we just want to see justice done by our daughter."
Gabe Watson Headed To Alabama To Face Trial For Killing Wife - DothanFirst.com
It was Valeska making all the noise about Australia holding Alabama hostage over the death penalty, not Tina's family.
Can I summarize the 1,124 posts in this thread for new people to the forum.
Some people think Gabe Watson is guilty of killing his wife.
Some people think Gabe Watson is innocent of killing his wife.
Nothing said here makes a hill's bit of beans.
The discussion will continue until Gabe Watson gets convicted and sentenced.
Amen.
You missed those who have no idea of his guilt or innocence, based on the information available in the public domain.
Sorry but the way I read the bolded bits and especially the parts I have highlighted in red. They are not saying they will accept anything but their idea of what is justice they are talking about a sentence which to me says they will not accept anything but a guilty verdict since people found innocent are not sent to prison for long or short terms, death penalties or life in prison!
Gabe isn't allowed to even visit Tina's grave...I just think this is sad on so many levels.