US admits killing Egyptian with Suez Canal warning shots

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Red Sea Shadow

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Messages
2,580
Reaction score
87
CAIRO (AFP) — The US embassy in Cairo admitted on Wednesday that a US navy-chartered boat killed an Egyptian when it fired warning shots at a small boat plying its trade near the Suez Canal two days ago.
The US had initially denied that there were any casualties in the incident, insisting that all the warning shots were seen hitting the water.
"The Global Patriot ... fired warning shots at a small boat approaching the ship as it was preparing to transit the Suez Canal... It appears that an Egyptian in the boat was killed by one of the warning shots," said a statement.
"The boats were hailed and warned by a native Arabic speaker using a bullhorn to warn them to turn away. A warning flare was then fired. One small boat continued to approach the ship and received two sets of warning shots."
The embassy said the incident was under investigation and "we express our deepest condolences to the family of the deceased."
US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said on Tuesday that the US was working with the Egyptian authorities to "make sure that we have good, clear, open communication so you do not have a repeat of these kinds of incidents."
Egyptian accounts said one man was shot dead and two other people wounded on Monday when the US ship fired on barges which approached the vessel wanting to sell merchandise.
US ambassador to Cairo Francis Ricciardone on Tuesday expressed regret over the incident but said the facts needed clarification.
"We regret if there are victims but we have to know what really happened from both sides," Ricciardone told a meeting of businessmen in Cairo.
US warships in the Middle East have previously been harassed or attacked by small boats.
Egypt's official MENA news agency said that "an Egyptian citizen was killed and two others injured when a US military vessel opened fire at a small boat."
A medic at Suez hospital who asked not to be named said Mohammed Moqtar Afifi was killed by one bullet. The incident occurred as the Global Patriot was in the Gulf of Suez preparing to sail to the Mediterranean from the Red Sea.
Afifi was buried in a Suez suburb on Tuesday.
The chief of US navy operations Admiral Gary Roughead said on Tuesday that the leader of the US navy security team had authority to respond and that the incident was under investigation.
He said the navy commonly places security detachments aboard merchant vessels chartered by the US Military Sealift Command to move military cargo around the world.
Despite being protected by the US military, the ship had no obvious military markings, an AFP correspondent said, and on Tuesday was continuing its trip across the Suez Canal.
The embassy and the navy had said that warning shots were fired "20-30 yards (metres) in front of the bow. All shots were accounted for as they entered the water."
In January, Iranian speedboats approached three US warships in the Strait of Hormuz and the order was given to open fire but they turned away at the last minute, according to US reports.
In 2000, waterborne Al-Qaeda militants carried out a suicide attack on the American warship USS Cole, killing 17 sailors.
According to the website of the US navy's Military Sealift Command, the MV Global Patriot is a roll-on roll-off transport ship chartered from Global Container Lines.
The Suez Canal, which opened in 1869, is Egypt's third-largest source of revenue after tourism and remittances from expatriate workers and currently about 7.5 percent of global trade passes through the waterway.
It is also a key route for the US military to carry weapons, supplies and troops to and from the Gulf, in particular Kuwait and Iraq.

Source: AFP: US admits killing Egyptian with Suez Canal warning shots
 
Very sad indeed. In a situation like this, the vessel should be marked if deadly force is going to be used to protect it since it wasn't a military vessel. During canal passages, how hard would it be to place a large banner over the side warning to stay clear of the boat. I realize this was most likely an accident, but live ammunition was being used. Sure, they used a blow horn, but I bet it would be hard to hear over the sound of your own engine. But then again, after the Cole attack and given the location I can understand the high state of alert.
 
The high state of alert is understood but the very basic precautions (like what you mentioned of placing a banner) were not taken into consideration!

Wouldn't such a banner also serve to identify a potential target for terrorist looking for a target. It is unfortunate that the bullhorn message and warning flares were not heeded and that subsequent small arms fire turned out to be deadly. But when actions, even with no hostile intent, are perceived to be threatening; outcomes like this are hard to prevent.
 
Every news story I saw on this since Monday has stated that one person was killed. In earlier stories the Navy said they were investigation and had no reports of casualties, which is not the same thing as insisting there were no casualties. It's rather typical for facts to come out first through other channels while official statements tend to be more measured and delayed.

Every boat, military or not, has the right to not be approached by another civilian craft. Not just terrorism but piracy is also a concern these days. The default should not be it's OK to approach unless warned in twenty ways not to, the default should be do not approach unless you have explicit permission to do so.

Several boats approached the ship. They were warned in Arabic to turn away. All but one did so it would appear the warning was adequate.
 
Every news story I saw on this since Monday has stated that one person was killed.

Every boat, military or not, has the right to not be approached by another civilian craft. Not just terrorism but piracy is also a concern these days. The default should not be it's OK to approach unless warned in twenty ways not to, the default should be do not approach unless you have explicit permission to do so.


I agree completely. Identifying banners that the boat was a U.S. chartered vessel would serve as a giant bull's eye in that part of the world, no matter who was on board.
 
Wouldn't such a banner also serve to identify a potential target for terrorist looking for a target. It is unfortunate that the bullhorn message and warning flares were not heeded and that subsequent small arms fire turned out to be deadly. But when actions, even with no hostile intent, are perceived to be threatening; outcomes like this are hard to prevent.
I don't think so. Raising the suitable banner only in crowded areas like the Suez Canal and its entry/exit won't give any time to plan a terrorist arrack.
 
I don't think so. Raising the suitable banner only in crowded areas like the Suez Canal and its entry/exit won't give any time to plan a terrorist arrack.

Terrorist attacks can be pre-planned for a location and method, zodiacs parked and loaded with explosives, standing by for the go signal when a banner is raised. Besides, how much "planning" does it take for that kind of attack?
 
Besides, how much "planning" does it take for that kind of attack?

In the Suez Canal? A lot!

Have you ever heard that a terrorist attack occurred in the Suez Canal? Although it's narrow enough that targeting any vessel will block it completely and allow for more time "and chaos" to target other "suspected" vessels.
 
Wouldn't such a banner also serve to identify a potential target for terrorist looking for a target.

I think to an extent it would. But it would also avoid any confusion and avoid innocent loss of life. If you clearly marked the vessel however, everyone should know to stay away. Then if another vessel approaches, bring out the .50 cal have at it. If the warning is clear and obvious there should be no reason to approach other than nefarious ones.
 

Back
Top Bottom