scubafanatic
Contributor
- Messages
- 5,090
- Reaction score
- 914
I always get a short hair cut before any dive trip, so my hair 'air dries' in 10 min anyway...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I was just reminded of the time when we ran out of ice toward the end of a liveaboard in Thailand/Burma and I remarked to an experienced fellow traveler that I thought it odd they had no ice maker aboard. He was taken aback by my comment and claimed that no liveaboards have ice makers. Every liveaboard I've been on since had an ice maker dutifully cranking away.My point is generalizing characteristics is difficult and skewed by the messanger and leads to inaccurate or unrepresentative conclusions. Generalizing just generally sucks.
Other comments:
· There are no hair dryers in room. In this day and age of airline baggage weight restrictions, hair dryers in rooms would help.
· There are no wireless internet connections on the boat once you leave the dock.
· There is no recycling onboard to protect the environment. I think most divers would appreciate this.
· The dock location is inconvenient to restaurants, shopping, etc. They provide transportation on Friday for dinner, but it was a 15 minute drive. Also, their dock was only accessible at high tide.
· The swinging of the boat 180 degrees on the mooring line takes some time to get used and made the boat often difficult to find, especially at night and with the poor visibility.
In closing, there were things my wife and I liked about our first experience on an Explorer ship, but the negatives relating to the understaffed boat, no back-up plan, concern for our safety, and attitude of the Captain clearly over weigh them and we cannot recommend the Turks & Caicos Explorer II. We do not believe that we got what we paid for or expected.
With regards to your other comments... It sounds to me like you expected a cruise on the Princess or Royal Caribbean... This is unrealistic.
Howard, we were not expecting a luxury cruise ship experience, but I think it would be reasonable to expect a full crew or a back-up plan when problems arose. In my opinion it is poor management to grant a crew member (divemaster) a vacation during the time when the boat is full with 21 guests. A full crew for the Turks & Caicos Explorer is 7 with 3 of the 7 being divemasters. We started out with only 2. The following week only 7 guests were scheduled to be on the boat. I know this because the captain repeatedly tried to solicit us with great discounts to extend our stay by one week. Thus, once they lost a divemaster with decompression sickness, they were down 2 crew members to 5. I propose that that there is no way that a crew of 5 can provide the service the Explorer fleet advertises, or they would staff their boats with only 5 crew members from the beginning. My problem with this poor management was that there were no back-up plans to provide either a replacement divemaster or crew member. You may say this is an unrealistic expectation, but I am in an industry that provides 24/7/365 care and we always have back-up plans when someone goes home sick, does not show up for work, goes on vacation, or there is inclement weather. It is not about "airlifting" in another divemaster. The boat was brought back close to shore so the bent divemaster could be transported to land by the Zodiac. An exchange of personnel was possible because the divemaster was bent the night before and the captain decided to have us dive the next morning before transporting the boat back. I am sure that he was in radio conversations with his office because there was someone waiting on shore to transport the divemaster to a decompression chamber.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I respect yours and I am glad that you had such a wonderful experience. I was expecting much the same, but unfortunately my experience because of many factors (and they have nothing to do with hairdryers) did not live up to those expectations. When the time is right, I will have to give a liveaboard experience another chance.
Let me ask you this. If you were a divemaster, and scheduled your vacation... then it just so happened that the trip filled up./QUOTE]
The trip was booked one year in advance by a dive shop that committed to fill the entire boat.
Lets say they even HAD another divemaster on another boat that had a "slow week" or could afford to not be on their regular boat. Like lets say that there was someone in Galapagos who could have covered the shift. What kind of expense would be involved with relocation of one guy from Galapagos to T&C for a week?/QUOTE]
We were told that the bent divemaster was not going to be allowed to dive for 6 weeks. By the time our trip was over we met the new divemaster that was recruited to be the 2nd divemaster on board for the group of 7 that replaced us.
It's really a shame that your trip was so ruined by the lack of a dive master to guide the dives. I know the people from Explorer, and I suggest you send an email to their main office in Wyoming, expressing your dismay at the situation./QUOTE]
Our trip was not ruined, it was just disappointing and not as great as our expectations based upon how others (including the captain and crew onboard) had built up those expectations as a liveaboard being the best dive vacation ever. A Trip Report is just that, a report to let others know what you personally experienced on a trip, some are great, some are good, some not so good and others bad. There are lots of things that go into an evaluation, not just a single thing.
I completed 2 reviews (their form evaluation and an e-mail) that I sent to Explorer when I returned from the trip. I have not to date received any response from them.