SORRY FOR THE DOUBLE POST! PLEASE SEE NEXT MESSAGE!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
madmole once bubbled...
From Mark Ellyatt from the CCR forums, on this very subject. Showing that light to Heavy is VERY bad. He is a DIR person so was using this as a dig at CCR but its relevent never the less and sums up the discussions on vestibular bends taking place lately
------------------------------------------
As much as I like Diver Mole, and usually use him as an expert resource about rebreathers, especially the Inspiration, in the case above his remarks are well off target and completely WRONG!
"Isobaric countertransport simply denotes isobaric diffusion of two gases in opposite directions. Perhaps a better descriptor is countercurrrent diffusion. Historically, both terms have been used, with the former mostly employed in the decompression arena. Countertransport processes are a concern in mixed gas diving, when differing gas solubilities and diffusion coefficients provide a means for multiple inert gases to move in opposite directions under facilitating gradients. While ambient pressure remains constant, such counterdiffusion currents can temporarily induce high tissure gas supersaturation levels, and greater susceptibility to bubble formation and DCI. In general, problems can be avoided when diving by employing LIGHT TO HEAVY (BREATHING) GAS MIXTURE SWITCHES (emphasis mine), and by using more slowly diffusing gases than the breathing mixture inside enclosure suits (drysuits). Such procedure promotes isobaric desaturation, as termed in the lore."
The above paragraph is from "Technical Diving in Depth" by B.R. Wienke, Ph.D., Los Alamos National Laboratory. The cite is on page 78.
Again, on page 81: "For HELIUM-TO-NITROGEN SWITCHING (the usual case for technical and commercial divers), a state of gas desaturation would ensue due to isobaric counterdiffusion." (Again emphasis is mine.)
I do not know what Mr. Ellyatt means (in his rambling statement posted by Diver Mole) when he says: "Having conversed with some doctors who seem pretty clued up on deco theory (not the IT professional type (oxymoron)", but I would have to make the assumption that he cannot be referring to Dr. Wienke.
Dr. Wienke is a Program Manager in the Nuclear Weapons Technology / Simulation and Computing Office at Los Alamos National Laboratory. His Ph.D. is in Particle Physics. He is a member of the LANL Nuclear Emergency Strategy Team (NEST) and functions as an adviser to Special Warfare Units in their diving activities. He is also an Instructor Trainer / Technical Instructor for NAUI. He is the developer of the RGBM and an adviser to DAN.
I also do not know what Mr. Ellyatt is referring to when he says: "what can best be described as "the usual bollox deco software", except to say that he cannot be referring to RGBM, since it was designed by physicists using supercomputers, and tested for some thousands of dive hours by NAUI's technical people.
Whatever else may be so, in reference to Mr. Ellyatt's remarks, his conclusion about Isobaric Counterdiffusion is in error, and it was an unusual error on the part of Diver Mole to post such misinformation.
I would like to request that Dr. Michael Powell, (who writes as Dr. Deco on this forum and is employed by NASA in the Bioastronautics Division), review the above and comment when he has a chance.
Doc, over to you!=-)
P.S.---I STILL want to know what this kinky thing is between the deco researchers and goats!:wacko: =-)
madmole once bubbled...
...anecdotal evidence coming from the RB forums where we are seeing a lot of vestibular bends when swapping off of helium mixes to denser N2 containing mixes. But we also see a few of them on air dill all the way and on He based dil all the way...
In the meantime I'm staying on the helium and taking the extra 5 min stops. Having suffered minor vertigo on several dives due to ear temperature differentials (I hate wearing thick hoods, so I wear thin neoprene which sometimes lets water to the ears if you move wrong), I'd hate to have a major attack. Its quite fun surfacing when the surface is at 45 degs:upset:
madmole once bubbled...
I meant an angle of 45 degs, Youd be in trouble here if the water was 45 degs temp wise (we use C!!)
is 45 F hot or cold?
Heres a fun suggestion
a) hang on deco line at 3m
b) Watch surface
c) lift hood off one ear
d) Watch surface move
![]()